CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Bunkster · 11-04-2010, 09:00 PM

Mr. Dedman, never give up on this argument: You ARE correct as is only a few others such as Mr. Ashley.

It is so inconceivable, that so many cannot see how this situation, that is fixable in a nano second with a software change, is so unfair.

Imagine this change DID take place and no one was told about it. The first run at the Winternationals in 2011, and I’ll use the usual scenario that seems to be the only one that anyone understands, is an A/S and a V/S: And the V/S win light comes on.

The A/S guy gets his time slip, and sees that the V/S car fouled by .005, and he, the A/S car, fouled by .007.

The A/S car starts whining about how unfair it is for him to be the loser. When it’s pointed out to him that he fouled worse than the V/S guy, the A/S guy says so what…..the V/S guy fouled first.

The A/S guy is then told that of course, if the V/S guy fouls, it’s going to be first. How is that unfair? How in the Hell is the V/S guy ever going to foul last against an A/S guy like you?

How in the Hell is it unfair to expect BOTH cars to have to take a shot at the tree? The tree is a basic…a fundamental…a must.

Those faster cars that win via a slower car fouling against you….you got a freebie…..a gimme…and you ought to be ashamed: You’re no better than someone on welfare that refuses to work for what they receive.

You got something for nothing, only because technology wasn’t used properly. Sort of like someone NOT getting out of prison because DNA was not used.

Next time I see a car win via a slower car foul, I believe I’m going to flip them the bird, and laugh.

11-04-2010, 09:00 PM	#195
Bunkster Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 307 Likes: 0 Liked 43 Times in 10 Posts	Re: 2011 Stock/Super Stock Rule Changes Mr. Dedman, never give up on this argument: You ARE correct as is only a few others such as Mr. Ashley. It is so inconceivable, that so many cannot see how this situation, that is fixable in a nano second with a software change, is so unfair. Imagine this change DID take place and no one was told about it. The first run at the Winternationals in 2011, and I’ll use the usual scenario that seems to be the only one that anyone understands, is an A/S and a V/S: And the V/S win light comes on. The A/S guy gets his time slip, and sees that the V/S car fouled by .005, and he, the A/S car, fouled by .007. The A/S car starts whining about how unfair it is for him to be the loser. When it’s pointed out to him that he fouled worse than the V/S guy, the A/S guy says so what…..the V/S guy fouled first. The A/S guy is then told that of course, if the V/S guy fouls, it’s going to be first. How is that unfair? How in the Hell is the V/S guy ever going to foul last against an A/S guy like you? How in the Hell is it unfair to expect BOTH cars to have to take a shot at the tree? The tree is a basic…a fundamental…a must. Those faster cars that win via a slower car fouling against you….you got a freebie…..a gimme…and you ought to be ashamed: You’re no better than someone on welfare that refuses to work for what they receive. You got something for nothing, only because technology wasn’t used properly. Sort of like someone NOT getting out of prison because DNA was not used. Next time I see a car win via a slower car foul, I believe I’m going to flip them the bird, and laugh.