View Single Post
Old 11-17-2010, 04:28 PM   #52
Bill Edgeworth
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 100957.00 really

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pagano View Post
expect the old cars to stay on top is wishful thinking.
__________________
Bill Edgeworth
No I dont but lets take the 64 Max Wedge cars that run AA and A and now have to run the ford and the new mopar. Who has the fastest car ? Shaul ? Compare and tell me thats fair, there are a bunch of 63 and 64 wedges out there, what do you think they should do ? If you tell me they should work harder thats crap, tell Shaul and Mosbeck that and see what they tell you.
Bob,

In my comments on the other thread I was not referring to the Shaul’s, Sorenson’s or DeArmonds of the world. I know how hard these guys have worked to get there combos as fast as they are. The work harder comment was in regards to the guys that just whine and moan about everything and don’t put an ounce of effort into making there stuff faster. The same guys that were complaining about all the fast old school cars before the new cars even existed.

Hats off to whomever it was that authored the thread “stock and late models a solution” some sound thinking rather than whining. But in my opinion as good an idea as it is it won’t happen. The new cars will continue to have a distinct advantage or the factories will not continue their involvement

Is the situation fair to the guys with old school AA and A combos? I certainly would not think so if I was one of them.
So no insult intended to the guys who do work hard on their stuff.
But as I said it’s a tough pill to swallow as I see it the old school AA & A cars are now sheep for the new cars to slaughter and that’s not going to change if it brings new cars and factory support to the table. And, as long as the factories view the slaughter as marketing tool things won’t change.
__________________
Bill Edgeworth 6471 STK
Bill Edgeworth is offline   Reply With Quote