Thread: 2011 ahfs
View Single Post
Old 11-19-2010, 11:27 PM   #9
Eric Merryfield
Senior Member
 
Eric Merryfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
Default Re: 2011 ahfs

Quote:
Originally Posted by A56 View Post
Bob,

Your right you dont need Headers, heck none of you do anymore, heck I could even slip on a set of old blackjacks as well since there will never be much need to R&D anymore. I wish I saw the petition. More importantly I wish that now we could be heard, but im afraid the fight might be over. As I said, if anyone knows who to talk to, how we can be heard, please let us know. Again ive never been one to get involved with sitautions as this due to the possible arguments from conflict of interest, but this new AHFS system has made me want to stand up tall and say that this is just a real bad idea for the class.

Mark Lelchook
#704 E/SA
Well its not done until its done.....a couple of years back I recall the E-shift drama....and even though if the potential changes are made, they will certainly affect more than just the new cars. As I read it, a stick car can affect an auto car and vice versa......that could have collateral issues not intended....

If the goal is to never go more than .99 under, tuning for 100% consistency and saving some money may be in vougue.....c-12 versus c-14 will slow it down a touch and save some $.....non-lightweight radials last a whole lot longer...don't have to have the super trick gun drilled axles, go for durability instead of aluminum everything in the tranny....might need to change that cam to a milder one too...still plenty of parts to buy, just a slighty different focus.

Assuming of course what Mike posted becomes the rule.

Eric
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK
Eric Merryfield is offline   Reply With Quote