CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

RJ Sledge · 12-09-2010, 11:26 AM

Alan you use the word "Fairly".......you kidding of course? What is fair about these combos that are "Fairly"?, rated at least 150hp under what they should be rated? Whats fair about that? If the AHFS is the answer (sic), why not let it work both ways? If a combo gets too much hp placed on it, then according to the AHFS, they could get hp taken off by not running so fast. It is suppose to work both ways, whats good for the goose.......now I think thats "Fair". You can't make a good agruement out of being "Fair" to the new cars, since this problem would not of come up without the total loss of what ever integrity the decision makers had. As Bernie said "just follow the money"

Fairly......yeah I got your Fairly!!

Later RJ

12-09-2010, 11:26 AM	#3
RJ Sledge Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 783 Likes: 498 Liked 288 Times in 90 Posts	Re: New AHFS 2011 Alan you use the word "Fairly".......you kidding of course? What is fair about these combos that are "Fairly"?, rated at least 150hp under what they should be rated? Whats fair about that? If the AHFS is the answer (sic), why not let it work both ways? If a combo gets too much hp placed on it, then according to the AHFS, they could get hp taken off by not running so fast. It is suppose to work both ways, whats good for the goose.......now I think thats "Fair". You can't make a good agruement out of being "Fair" to the new cars, since this problem would not of come up without the total loss of what ever integrity the decision makers had. As Bernie said "just follow the money" Fairly......yeah I got your Fairly!! Later RJ