CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

ron mattson · 12-11-2010, 01:40 PM

I have tried both 2.75 and 2.91 first gears and the 2.91 makes the car a animal in 60
feet .03-.04 better in sixty ft but hurts et from 60 to 330 it seems like the motor gets
pulled down to much to recover efficiently. i think a higher torque lower rpm engine may
be better suited to this application.

12-11-2010, 01:40 PM	#1
ron mattson Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: cloquet mn Posts: 466 Likes: 17 Liked 67 Times in 30 Posts	Re: ET Difference with 2.75 low gear I have tried both 2.75 and 2.91 first gears and the 2.91 makes the car a animal in 60 feet .03-.04 better in sixty ft but hurts et from 60 to 330 it seems like the motor gets pulled down to much to recover efficiently. i think a higher torque lower rpm engine may be better suited to this application. __________________ Ron Mattson 5015 STK