CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

John Stock · 05-23-2007, 03:46 PM

For any statistically challenged member of the audience, the reason the combo got horsepower in SS and not GT was because the run was -1.424 on SS/KA index of 11.55, it would have only been -1.374 on the GT/IA index of 11.50. Not to mention that that even though these are both 12 pound per horsepower classes he would have carried 35 pounds more to run GT/IA because of the ratings at the time.

Maybe you should build one, it might help keep the average down if it gets flagged for review.

05-23-2007, 03:46 PM	#41
John Stock Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 32 Likes: 0 Liked 45 Times in 2 Posts	For any statistically challenged member of the audience, the reason the combo got horsepower in SS and not GT was because the run was -1.424 on SS/KA index of 11.55, it would have only been -1.374 on the GT/IA index of 11.50. Not to mention that that even though these are both 12 pound per horsepower classes he would have carried 35 pounds more to run GT/IA because of the ratings at the time. Maybe you should build one, it might help keep the average down if it gets flagged for review.