View Single Post
Old 01-21-2012, 11:02 PM   #19
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 1,507
Liked 1,648 Times in 379 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Silverman View Post
So in the example that Greg gave with his 327, a camshaft with a lobe lift of .260 and a rocker arm ratio of 1.5 would give a theoretical lift at the spring retainer of .390, as specified. Could you not also use a camshaft with a lobe lift of .24375 and a rocker arm with a ratio of 1.6 to get the same lift at the retainer and still make spec? It would also, I think, open the valve faster and improve cylinder filling. Another reason to fabricate a head dyno!

Lew
Unless the rule has changed, a 1.6:1 rocker arm on an engine that came with a 1.5:1 rocker arm is illegal in Stock Eliminator.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote