CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

goinbroke2 · 04-20-2012, 11:45 AM

Alan, you said "In other words, you accuse Mark of playing favorites toward GM, while you evidently seem to think this is all "fine and dandy" because it "knocks Chevy off the top of the hill".

I'm not saying it's fine, I said there needs to be a correction. I guess the difference is that to me, it appears the correction only works fast enough when it's a chev. A non chev must be corrected NOW!

I'll concede your other points though as I wasn't specifically thinking stock elim when I mentioned the flathead/sbc thing. I should have, as that is what's pertinent here. Also, chev putting the hp where they did is very interesting, who would of said what if it were 200hp less?

What is in the books is legal. For good or bad.

04-20-2012, 11:45 AM	#121
goinbroke2 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NS CANADA Posts: 892 Likes: 1,646 Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts	Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights Alan, you said "In other words, you accuse Mark of playing favorites toward GM, while you evidently seem to think this is all "fine and dandy" because it "knocks Chevy off the top of the hill". I'm not saying it's fine, I said there needs to be a correction. I guess the difference is that to me, it appears the correction only works fast enough when it's a chev. A non chev must be corrected NOW! I'll concede your other points though as I wasn't specifically thinking stock elim when I mentioned the flathead/sbc thing. I should have, as that is what's pertinent here. Also, chev putting the hp where they did is very interesting, who would of said what if it were 200hp less? What is in the books is legal. For good or bad.