CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

goinbroke2 · 12-19-2013, 12:50 PM

"good controversy" is the point to take from all of this. IHRA (it appears) wanted to speed up or simplify tech and came out with a rule. The racers on here generated 6 pages of controversy in a few days. IHRA is going to reconvene in the new year and revisit the decision.
I agree, that's GOOD controversy! IHRA is actually listening and responding to the needs or wishes of the racers!
The other positive note I take from this is the sanctioning body gave a "freebee" to the racers and they declined knowing it wasn't in the best interest of the class, even if it would of been in their own personal best interest to accept it.

Dan Fahey, thanks for running point on this and being the un-elected liason between IHRA and the Pure Stock ranks.

12-19-2013, 12:50 PM	#56
goinbroke2 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NS CANADA Posts: 902 Likes: 1,725 Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts	Re: Pure Stockers New Camshaft Rule !!! "good controversy" is the point to take from all of this. IHRA (it appears) wanted to speed up or simplify tech and came out with a rule. The racers on here generated 6 pages of controversy in a few days. IHRA is going to reconvene in the new year and revisit the decision. I agree, that's GOOD controversy! IHRA is actually listening and responding to the needs or wishes of the racers! The other positive note I take from this is the sanctioning body gave a "freebee" to the racers and they declined knowing it wasn't in the best interest of the class, even if it would of been in their own personal best interest to accept it. Dan Fahey, thanks for running point on this and being the un-elected liason between IHRA and the Pure Stock ranks.