Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Southerland
It would take people who have high integrity. Some of us have more history than others to draw on, but the human failings are hard to overcome to maintain objectivity and justice. A person's character and beliefs are far more important than age. When you can be influenced by how much somebody puts into the kitty to keep your game going, that is obvious evidence of the lack of ethics that are needed to be the foundation of the sport. I do not think that there is a perfect system, but the one currently in place has major inadequacies.
Alan, while the ideas behind the AHFS seem to meet the criteria for an objective self-adjusting system, it fails to be able to be effective when the playing field gets bombarded to often with ringers that will take years to be adjusted correctly. That's where some individual prudent judgment is better.
|
Looking back on most of these conversations, the issue is not with AHFS, but rather the HP at entry. The question for most seems to be whether the decision makers are inept, uncaring, or corrupt. I for one thing that the decisions are made outside of the knowledgable tech people. Probably pushed in to place in exchange for something that equates to money coming into the hands of overpaid executive level types.The overpaid execs don't much care let alone understand the impact that the sportsman have over the organization as a whole.
We only see the end result, but the issue is as deep as Chicago Politics.
It does not take a calculator or a dyno to figure out the hp is waaaay too soft when a legal stocker can dominate in SS.