CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Dwight Southerland · 12-04-2014, 02:23 PM

I think the wording is meant to imply the vehicle in question. In this current example the vehicle in question is a 68 Mustang coupe. Don't try to make their wording more technically legalistic than it is. The opening description of the rulebook section states "Cars will be classified using the shipping weight of the body divided by thehorsepower or performance rating of the engine used." The body in that statement is the body you have, not anything else. The intent is to use the heaviest shipping weight of the particular model-body you have. So, for example, you can't use the shipping weight of a 4- or 6-cylinder Camaro when calculating the class when the V8 models were heavier.

12-04-2014, 02:23 PM	#16
Dwight Southerland VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything. Posts: 2,001 Likes: 64 Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts	Re: GT Classification Worksheet I think the wording is meant to imply the vehicle in question. In this current example the vehicle in question is a 68 Mustang coupe. Don't try to make their wording more technically legalistic than it is. The opening description of the rulebook section states "Cars will be classified using the shipping weight of the body divided by thehorsepower or performance rating of the engine used." The body in that statement is the body you have, not anything else. The intent is to use the heaviest shipping weight of the particular model-body you have. So, for example, you can't use the shipping weight of a 4- or 6-cylinder Camaro when calculating the class when the V8 models were heavier.