View Single Post
Old 10-19-2015, 11:48 AM   #48
GregP
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Schubeck lifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Simpson View Post
I disagree with roller lifters unless your combo came with them. I know we can not go back on some rules but if there was a spring pressure limit that would not require shubeck style lifters we may not have as many problems as this. This is turn would slow some combinations down but in time (lower RPM's) HP would be reduced and we would be better off. Look, the only thing separating Stock from SS (from the 80's-90's) is a intake, pan and and any lift roller cam. We already have the crank, rods, block, pistons, rings, HEADS, rockers and carbs. Stop turning Stock into Super Stock light. I know the New cars are Super modified style engines in Stock but they are in there own classes. Just my opinion.
I agree 100%, we are already using roller rockers and other items that take Stock toward the superstockers. lets keep stockers with what they currently have. I think the roller rockers shouldnt be allowed unless the engine was origional equiped with. I hate to say it out loud but when NHRA allows stock to venture off like they have with some of the parts etc it makes it look like someone is pushing the evelope to them for more parts sales etc.
GregP is offline   Reply With Quote