[Bruce Noland]

edit.

Len,

I know it is getting a little warm for you in here, but you failed to answer one one very simple question. When did nhra give advance notice that it was going to group such a large number of dissimilar vehicles together for reviews? The ahfs makes a point of connecting the Firebird and Camaro but it is not believable for us to think that Corvettes, Omegas, Appolos, Cutlas and Chevelles should be connected for reviews. This list includes everything from wagons to Corvettes. Doesn't it make sense that nhra should list the vehicle combinations for the racers instead of offering generic statement.
Please tell us when you published that information?

edit,

Len,
I missed your earlier post about the 2003 ahfs. This statement at issue has not been in the ahfs since it's origin.To clarify your statement, I believe you meant that the statement's origin was from 2003. My issues are not with the 2003 version. My issues are with the latest version which actually uses that statement to justify the huge number of dissimilar combinations that are now grouped together. And of course nhra never bothered to tell us they were going to group these combinations. I think you need to answer that question. You can attempt to make me look like the bad guy for pressing you for an answer but in the end it's your responsibility to get answers for our questions. We all know you have failed to answer a very simple question.

Also, the current ahfs may resemble the original but that is about it. It sure functions in a different manner.