View Single Post
Old 12-03-2007, 08:00 PM   #52
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 712
Liked 1,608 Times in 585 Posts
Default Re: Mopar 440 racers - time to legalize that shortblock!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn A McCarty View Post
No it screws up the water hole in the front. So, I was told certain "Hemi" teams were allowed to go into the foundry and massage the foundry cores.

Lynn
It does not affect the water pump mounts. If this was the case, then the 383/400 engine would have the same problem. The camshaft bore C/L to crankshaft C/L is the same for both the RB and B blocks and they share the same timing sets. When the RB block was created, they just added material to the deck height in the same fashion that there are different deck heights for the Chevy big block engine: there is a standard deck and tall deck. Was the 1959/1960 383 block with the 3.75 stroke cast with an RB or B block deck height? It appears they are rare and hard to find. Therefore, if the 1959/1960, 383 block was cast with the B block deck height, has an OEM 3.75 stroke, what would preclude its use in SS class as a 440 engine?
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote