Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Freese
I don't post on here very often but do a lot of reading. I find this topic almost mirroring our last election. People know the terms and rules of the deal going in and then want to piss and moan when it don't go there way. I don't give a **** either way as some have previously stated that if you're red you don't deserve to win. Here's a novel idea, don't red light and let the pigeon next to you do it so there is no argument. I find it ironic that the people that do most of the winning do the least of the talking. I believe that IF you changed this rule, the same people will continue to win and the same will continue to lose. What would be the new excuse...I redlit first but so did the other guy but mine was worse so I still lost. If you politicians spent as much time on your practice tree as you do your keyboard you might actually surprise yourself. Please find something constructive to do with your time as all of the self legislating is killing this sport and driving people away. Yeah, I need lots of help so don't bother.
|
If your belief is that nothing will change with the implementation of Tru-Start, why not let it happened????????????
Remember when everybody was up in arms about Auto-Start and nobody even thinks about it anymore????????????
This could possibly be invisible and at the same time correct a long running problem???????
I also remember and raced with a flagman start. The flagman would move the slower car down the track based a guess of what the performance change would be. First car to the finish line would be the winner. NO RED LIGHTS & NO BREAKOUTS. I think that the handicap start is the fairest way for a faster car to race a slower car. But we are NOT done yet, not without Tru-Start.....
The people who talk about how is was, just seem to forget about how unfair it was....