03-28-2018, 09:34 PM
|
#17
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 2,927
Liked 5,143 Times in 1,964 Posts
|
Re: What does "NES" (No Engine Specifications) mean...
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdanner
Oh most definitely. The one rub is the cracking intake I mentioned. I think also look at it from the respect of when they fit the same class with the same engine, hence the same weight, punching the smaller hole in the air has to be beneficial. Plus that Mustang bodystyle has so many more engine combinations if a change is ever desired.
That guy's own words in recent months on a Tbird/Cougar forum:
"it has a big cam, big intake, big compression, big heads and big cubes"
"TFS intake, TFS heads, 90mm maf, 3.5" intake tube, 75 mm throttle body (too small), Bullet custom cams, 12.5/1 comp ratio,
big bore/stroker 5.3 Liter, Eagle crank, eagle rods, SHM 1 7/8"-3" long tubes, 4500 stall converter, 4:56 gears. E-85 for fuel."
|
Best running 2V 315, I mean 281, I've ever seen.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
|
|
|