11-22-2019, 10:08 AM
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
Re: What Stock rules would you change?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees
Jack, have you been watching Adam Shiff for too long on TV? Hale's combo went from 325 to 265 in one shot. Just for the record, that's 18.46 %. I was thinking more along the lines of 389/421 or 348/409.
Maybe instead of un- competitive combos I should have said antiquated combos?
Yeah, I've got a bunch of bad combos laying around here but I'm not complaining and I'm not looking for new intakes, cams and cylinder heads either.
As far as "Bernie Sanders Socialist Stock", it kinda looks like that right now!
The ruling hierarchy (read; big-block anything) has gotten so many new "replacement" parts that you can build a new 396,426,427,428, 440 without using ANY STOCK parts! What did all of the peons get? Other than the 302 FFFFords (an action taken by a person in power who knew nothing about what he was doing) we haven't gotten much. We ARE however expected to pick up the same amounts of performance in relation to the index as the hierarchy.
And OBTW, why should I have to show anybody 5K in receipts and wait 2 years to get 5 HP back? The way that it's been done lately is to give certain people 5K cash or buy them lunch and you get what you want.
|
Billy you spelled Adam's last name incorrectly. It's spelled ADAM S**T !
|
|
|