View Single Post
Old 02-11-2020, 11:50 PM   #7
Mark Yacavone
Veteran Member
 
Mark Yacavone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,113 Times in 1,948 Posts
Default Re: 327 300 1965 stocker

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Nyhus View Post
Jim, we know what good 327-275's make so what we're looking at is....

-the difference between a good AFB and a good QJet
-what (if any) difference there is in the cam (.399/.399 on the 300 & .390/.410 on the 275)
-what (if any) difference there is in a good AFB intake compared to a good Qjet intake

The 327/300 @ 265 isn't horrible. But the 327/250 is the same engine (except for the 4G) and intake and it's @ 245. I don't see the AFB covering the 20 hp difference, even with the intake being a bit better on the AFB.....given the current state of Stocker intake technology.

But .60-.70 under should be no problem for a decent 327/300, though. -Al
Al, it's 260 in a Chevelle with iron heads ..That's 60 pounds lighter in !/SA..Something anyway.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers
Mark Yacavone is offline   Reply With Quote