Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone
You know what it means and why the writers put it in there .
So then why are you quoting Wong Kim Ark, when it's a 14th amendment case?
Let me bottom line this and end this theme you hate so much .
Anchor babies are not Natural Born Citizens and can't be President.
Oh wait...Define "birther" for your fans here.
|
120 plus eligibility lawsuits from the 2008, 2012, and 2016 election cycles were dismissed in lower courts due to the challengers' difficulty in showing that they had standing to raise legal objections, which they didn't. Additionally, some experts have suggested that the precise meaning of the natural-born-citizen clause may never be decided by the courts because, in the end, presidential eligibility may be determined to be a non-justiciable political question that can be decided only by Congress rather than by the judicial branch of government. Until that time Mark all you have is opinion that is not based on FACT but on CONSPIRACY THEORY. These theorist i.e. Apaio, Zullo and the ever infamous dentist/lawyer Orly Taitz will again be cast aside by the facts and the law. You used the term "anchor babies", neither Congress nor the President have signed anything addressing this issue, no law, no legal basis to challenge one's citizenship. Birther = Conspiracy theorist
One of the conspiracy theorist finest moments: