Thread: VP race fuels
View Single Post
Old 04-02-2008, 10:54 AM   #5
Dave Cook
Junior Member
 
Dave Cook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: VP race fuels

Quote:
Originally Posted by J Kuchel View Post
Ok does the static comp. and the cranking comp. make that much difference? The static is 9.69 to 1 but it has alot of cranking comp. due to the camshaft profile.
If you spin it many RPM's, your octane requirement does go up, but I agree, you are probably wasting $$ and performance potential by running more octane than you need. Octane is, in simple terms, the measure of the resistance to ignition....if you are running race fuel in a low compression engine, you have to advance the timing to recover the performance you may get with lower octane and less ignition lead.

B.T.W., my engine is 15.01:1 static, with a fairly long duration flat tappet cam. I run any generic "110" leaded fuel that is available, but never spin it over 6500 RPM's, run it cool, (130 at the line) and run it fat on the carb jetting.

Last edited by Dave Cook; 04-02-2008 at 10:58 AM.
Dave Cook is offline   Reply With Quote