CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Mike Volkman · 08-20-2021, 08:19 AM

I'm not sure of the point being made. Are you saying that NHRA can't tech and create level playing fields because they are struggling to stay alive? Unsure of the connection.

They have no sponsors anymore and have literally made those who did help us angry with their practices. Look at the behaviors between NASCAR during covid and NHRA. Big difference.

I see it as repeated poor or ineffective decision making in many areas starting at the top by non-racing people. We pay them to race in their organization. In class racing they have the inherited responsibility to not only enforce their rules but to also bring parity to the class. Unless I'm way of base here this is the feel received from many racers, I'm just a little more vocal.

Take the Factory Stock cars - they constantly are forcing changes in pulley sizes and weights in an attempt to level the field. I see this as inconsistency in decision making. Only applies to FS?

Here's the point. I just told Em that I've been here doing this since I was 8 years old when Tom Sheehan and I got yelled at for using the outhouse roof's shingles as Frisbees. That's 54 years. I've seen alot. They were yanking a head off Carl's car after he won a race at the local track following a stock race. I got to clean the bolts and thought it was something special.

Racers race in class racing, and they may complain about being torn apart, but there was integrity to the sport and in my opinion, the down fall to class racing will not be the economy or electric vehicles or any other of the changes we are going through in the world. The down fall for "the true class racer" will be these 2 issues.

In an aging population of racers, my hope is that either NHRA will come to realize they have a problem which needs addressed or Bo, Jason, Ken, Tyler and whomever can get together and create a series that has some validity to it with real parity and tech. Other than that it is no different than the local bracket or association races. I will still support all types of racing organizations in hope something changes until I get tired of it and then as with things in life, with you're done, you're done.

I know that the SRAC members wanted feedback on the AHFS and received very little. Unsure as to why?

My thoughts are majority rules. I'm not a my way or the highway type of guy. If everyone wants no tech and no parity then so be it. I even went as far as to tell NHRA and SRAC, that SDS would pay for "Survey Monkey" to canvas all stock/ss racers who have raced in the last 2 years and get their opinion with majority winning. This way it removes everyone's personal agenda. Survey Monkey is a established company and not one of these put your mark here surveys with multiple voting, etc.

Just my opinions.

08-20-2021, 08:19 AM	#9
Mike Volkman Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2020 Posts: 79 Likes: 32 Liked 497 Times in 50 Posts	Re: What Made NHRA Legitimate to the Racer I'm not sure of the point being made. Are you saying that NHRA can't tech and create level playing fields because they are struggling to stay alive? Unsure of the connection. They have no sponsors anymore and have literally made those who did help us angry with their practices. Look at the behaviors between NASCAR during covid and NHRA. Big difference. I see it as repeated poor or ineffective decision making in many areas starting at the top by non-racing people. We pay them to race in their organization. In class racing they have the inherited responsibility to not only enforce their rules but to also bring parity to the class. Unless I'm way of base here this is the feel received from many racers, I'm just a little more vocal. Take the Factory Stock cars - they constantly are forcing changes in pulley sizes and weights in an attempt to level the field. I see this as inconsistency in decision making. Only applies to FS? Here's the point. I just told Em that I've been here doing this since I was 8 years old when Tom Sheehan and I got yelled at for using the outhouse roof's shingles as Frisbees. That's 54 years. I've seen alot. They were yanking a head off Carl's car after he won a race at the local track following a stock race. I got to clean the bolts and thought it was something special. Racers race in class racing, and they may complain about being torn apart, but there was integrity to the sport and in my opinion, the down fall to class racing will not be the economy or electric vehicles or any other of the changes we are going through in the world. The down fall for "the true class racer" will be these 2 issues. In an aging population of racers, my hope is that either NHRA will come to realize they have a problem which needs addressed or Bo, Jason, Ken, Tyler and whomever can get together and create a series that has some validity to it with real parity and tech. Other than that it is no different than the local bracket or association races. I will still support all types of racing organizations in hope something changes until I get tired of it and then as with things in life, with you're done, you're done. I know that the SRAC members wanted feedback on the AHFS and received very little. Unsure as to why? My thoughts are majority rules. I'm not a my way or the highway type of guy. If everyone wants no tech and no parity then so be it. I even went as far as to tell NHRA and SRAC, that SDS would pay for "Survey Monkey" to canvas all stock/ss racers who have raced in the last 2 years and get their opinion with majority winning. This way it removes everyone's personal agenda. Survey Monkey is a established company and not one of these put your mark here surveys with multiple voting, etc. Just my opinions.