Quote:
Originally Posted by GarysZ24
I think Ellis misunderstood what I was saying. I was referring to FWD automatic Stockers vs FWD manual Stockers. I mentioned all of the recent year FWD Stocker racers who have been going rounds (and Billy just added credibility to my opinion) , and based on what I've seen, all of them have automatics in them. We've been going more rounds than manual trannied Stockers, because our cars are easier to dial what they'll actually run. I wasn't sure about Ron's car, so I looked up this years Indy and saw that he and Owen's Grand Am were automatics, to go with Bill's, Billy's, mine, Brent's and Stan's cars as well. Who's been running a manual that has been going rounds against the RWD contingent like we have? I can't think of anyone, and I try to follow everyone who campaigns a FWD Stocker as well. The race results show it for all of us.
|
Now you're missing the point . I never said FWD automatics couldn't go rounds. Especially when there are no sticks out there.Dave Noll has been local so far.
The guy in Co. went a few rounds this year. Polhill has been locked down, but has gone deep at Indy several times. Bill Drevo won a Divisional, and don't forget the biggest FWD winner yet. All of this means bupkis ..I know what I see, watching races with all the info right in front of me.
You're not going to convince me stick cars are less consistent. I've been winning races with them for almost 50 years.
Maybe you can convince Chris Knudsen or Brad Zaskowski ;-)