CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

02-04-2023, 07:54 PM

This is the rule as written.

HELMET For all 10.00 and slower cars, either an open-face or a full-face Snell: M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA: 8860-2010,
8860-2015 or 8860-2018 helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. For all 9.99 and quicker cars, a full-face Snell:
M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA:
8860-2010, 8860-2015 or 8860-2018
helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. See General Regulations 10:7.

Just says about modification to the Helmet, visor and or , Windshield. Nothing about blocking or having to look at the full tree?
What is happening here is not using any of the above.
BTW I’m not a blocker, but I have no problem with someone who is long as he is safe and following the rules above.
I still think this rule has been mostly written because anti blockers have influenced a sympathetic person in power for their own benefit and agenda.

02-04-2023, 07:54 PM	#5
Todd Hoven Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Blinder/Blocker clarification needed This is the rule as written. HELMET For all 10.00 and slower cars, either an open-face or a full-face Snell: M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA: 8860-2010, 8860-2015 or 8860-2018 helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. For all 9.99 and quicker cars, a full-face Snell: M2015, M2020, SA2015, SA2020, FIA: 8860-2010, 8860-2015 or 8860-2018 helmet mandatory; shield permitted (goggles prohibited). Taping or similar modifications to the helmet or helmet shield that reduces the driver's field of vision prohibited. See General Regulations 10:7. Just says about modification to the Helmet, visor and or , Windshield. Nothing about blocking or having to look at the full tree? What is happening here is not using any of the above. BTW I’m not a blocker, but I have no problem with someone who is long as he is safe and following the rules above. I still think this rule has been mostly written because anti blockers have influenced a sympathetic person in power for their own benefit and agenda.