09-13-2023, 12:19 PM
|
#2
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 1,890
Liked 969 Times in 307 Posts
|
Re: U/SA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees
Ya know, I personally believe that the 302 FFFFord deal turned out to be a good thing even though I didn't think so at first. A bunch of cars got built and that's a good thing.
However, NHRA should have taken a lesson from this and dropped the factors on a lot more lo/po combos.
The thing that I see when dealing with the 302s is that NHRA considers each body and year as a separate combo because of FFFFord's way of "part-numbering heads and manifolds by year, making HP hits a long, drawn out thing.
My 307 and 301 stuff has different numbered heads and intakes and even different cam specs but they're all (largely) considered the same.
But this is O/T so, "back to our regularly-scheduled program".
|
Billy you know you want to build a fffford.
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop.
|
|
|