Thread: U/SA
View Single Post
Old 09-16-2023, 04:03 PM   #9
jmantle
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Black Creek, BC Canada
Posts: 331
Likes: 78
Liked 172 Times in 81 Posts
Default Re: U/SA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory McNeil View Post
Being a Ford guy, maybe I am a bit biased, but all NHRA did was lower the 302 2 barrel combos back to the factories original HP rating. It had been factored to 200 HP across the board , which I believe, was way too high, which would likely explain why nobody was running those combinations. Now, what about many other combinations, that NHRA dropped the HP ratings, well BELOW the factory ratings? Guess nobody seems to mind when THOSE cars qualify at or near the top, not to mention are allowed to run a bunch of "accepted" aftermarket components, which are not available to some other engines, including the 302 2 barrel Fords, or for that matter many of the "lower classed" combos.
Rory, I don't deny the 302 combos needed a little help to be competitive but to put them back to factory was overkill. NHRA has to take into consideration what makes sense and that wasn't done in this case. My car is a natural U car and was competitive in U before the Fords received their big gift. I was one of the lucky ones, 300 lbs of ballast and it's a V car but the other V8 cars didn't have this available to them.

Jim Mantle V/SA 6632
__________________
Jim Mantle U/V/SA 6632
jmantle is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked