View Single Post
Old 10-08-2023, 12:32 PM   #36
john ancona
Member
 
john ancona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 192
Likes: 3
Liked 186 Times in 57 Posts
Default Re: Flat tappet lifter failure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich View Post
Roller cams will not solve the problem, and will not make it cheaper. It will only make it more expensive, change the failure mode, and cause more problems. It will create another R&D expense. It won't make anyone any faster, except maybe someone who has unlimited funds to invest in camshaft and valvetrain testing.Roller cams will simply cause more problems, and make nothing cheaper.


What will people cry about tearing up next? What rule change will they demand? How much will it cost?


Where will it stop?
All this type of unfounded information ,that is just flat wrong again ,and again is not welcome by many ,simply put we are already using billet camshafts ground for solid lifters, that are DLC coated in order to run valve spring pressures well above the limits of a solid lifter at what is already what many say on this site as expensive , so maybe the uninformed may want to go do some of there own research as to the cost before they make false statements , I have said this before many times on this site since 1985 car manufactures have went to roller cams , and before all you opinionated racers express your own views telling others to run a car with roller lifters from the factory ,you may be better served by understanding there is a reason as to why many like running the older cars
__________________
John Ancona 717 STK / SS
john ancona is offline   Reply With Quote