Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320racer
you are very wrong
|
I see the flaw in my statement. I guess it really depends what is really defined as "traction control." I would put it into 2 categories, active, and passive traction control. I would consider time based timing retards to be passive. They are either programmed into the msd box, or the ecu. With these, the timing curve will be exactly the same every run, which has proven to be very consistent for many cars that use a setup like this. What I can't imagine to be super consistent would be a type of "active" traction control, where the msd or ecu is responding to wheel speed. I know that computers have come a long way, but the response time of something like this may not be quite fast enough for it to work with absolute accuracy. Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm sure you will, but I've never heard of someone using an arc module or something similar that does the work of a "matty box" for you, and replicates runs with accuracy by changing the tune of the car going down the track.