View Single Post
Old 01-12-2009, 03:26 PM   #11
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 711
Liked 1,538 Times in 575 Posts
Default Re: SFI Scattersheild meeting

Some years ago, I challenged SFI on the 2 year requirement. I collected data from S/SS and Comp stick shift racers. Also, I took a Lakewood bellhousing, did extensive structural analysis and gave the data to NHRA.

After a telephone discussion with NHRA, they asked me to submit and talk to SFI. What a joke!!!
Spent 30 minutes with SFI's Arnie Kuhns and he could not come up with a single piece of factual or historical data on S/SS or Comp classes. The criteria SFI based their finding and requiremnt was from circle track and off-road racing vehicles for which they did not have a requirement for a SFI approved flywheel or clutch assembly in their rules. Many of these classes were still running OEM or Chinesium flywheels/clutches. Due to their failures, SFI applied the requirement as a general rule to all motorsports requirements.

NHRA has the authority to use the SFI requirements as a "Guideline" or "Suggestion" and extend the requirement as they deem appropriate for S/SS and Comp classes.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote