|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 522
Liked 331 Times in 179 Posts
|
![]()
With all the talk on this site about the NEW 2008 or 09/10 Mustang CJ horsepower ratings---Not being a Ford follower what engine did the Factory use to create this engine ? & what is the factory HP rating for the UNBLOWN engine as well as the Factory HP rating for the CJ engine--- Do not care if the CJ rating is bogus just trying to see how much of a power increase was achieved by putting the blower on as opposed to a unblown engine---now I understand that cams were changed and valve sizes etc.really not rying to stir anything up just trying to see/understand how much HP increase can be achieved on an/any engine by supercharging it---thanx Comp 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 1,664
Liked 2,632 Times in 438 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, Ct. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 522
Liked 331 Times in 179 Posts
|
![]()
thanx for the info---another ? is there any type of engine that Ford uses in another application similar in design to the CJ but WITHOUT a blower??? Just trying in my mind to see how much difference a blower makes by simply bolting it on instead of just having a normally aspirated engine. Like for example if you took the blower off and just had the FI no blower what would that same engine be rated at. 100 HP less 200/300 or what??? Thanx Comp 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 1,664
Liked 2,632 Times in 438 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, Ct. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
What was the Navigator engine? I thought it was a 5.4 4v.
I looked buying a new Lincoln Aviator (Explorer) once. Wasn't that a 4.6L 4V? I wanted it because it looked like good hot rod material. They had that tune so soft it was ridiculous, poor bottom end to 3500 RPM, then once it got going it retarded the throttle / timing when it shifted and it took forever to get the rev's going from there. I called a couple of chip tuners and they said they would never mess with it, small market and unique Lincoln wiring and computer. So I passed on it. My stock '05 Expedition with 5.4L 3v and 3.73's is much better on acceleration. I'd love to play with a new SHO Taurus!
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
How about the '03 and '04 MACH 1 Mustang and the Cobra. They both had the 4.6L DOHC engines but the Cobra's was supercharged. If I remember correctly the Mach 1 had 305 hp and the Cobra 390 hp. I think these engines were the same except for less compression is the Cobra.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|