|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 246
Likes: 272
Liked 94 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
sorry, don't know now to cancel. . jeff
Last edited by stock1080; 03-04-2018 at 11:58 AM. Reason: this was a dum ? on my part |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 970
Likes: 422
Liked 204 Times in 93 Posts
|
![]()
touchy subject...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Colorado hills
Posts: 123
Likes: 11
Liked 73 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
Sir 305,
You might find that a GM OEM valve that is 2.00" diameter and has a hollow stem would work well when reduced in diameter and reshaped. The shape is best decided on a flow bench, but at least that is a good start. Since any valve job is legit, you might also find that something less than the original 45 degree face/seat is also more beneficial because of the relatively low lifts of those engines. However, like many things there are various opinions that can be either refuted or supported via your own test data. ![]() Regards, HB2 ![]() Dissident Above comments are for Stock, not SS. However the selection of the valve might be the same answer and the face/seat be steeper than 45 degrees. Intake valve shape should end up with a 10-12max degree backside. Last edited by Dissident; 03-07-2018 at 12:34 AM. Reason: addressed stock and not SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: malden,ma
Posts: 246
Likes: 272
Liked 94 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
I deleted the ? It was about intake manifolds. A lot of viewers of ? I understand now why I couldn't get the simplest answer. I respect that. tks jeff
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|