|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
It's been said before many times, but it is worth repeating - the IHRA guys are really decent people to engage in a conversation. No dismissive attitudes from them and they go out of their way to offer their help.
Mike and I covered several topics and threw in some old time bench racing to boot. The new OEM cars came up during the course of our conversation. Mike said he had some preliminary conversations with racers about the new cars;Ford and Mopar. He said that he was interested in creating a Factory Muscle Class for these new cars. As I remember, he may have mentioned something about setting up some match races for these cars. That is really getting back to the 60's OEM power-wars. I'm going to a few IHRA races this year. These guys really deserve the racers support.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Garden City, MI
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
They are good people. Problem is the tracks are getting further away and lesser facilitys. Entry fees continue to go up and purses are the same or less and contingencies are way down. If fuel costs spike back up, you would almost lose money even if you won a points race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 963
Likes: 338
Liked 161 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I totally agree with you about the tracks are getting further and further!!! Stephen Johnson #2162 Horace Johnson #2167 SS/D 427 ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Living in Virginia makes the access easier. Given my skill level, making money with one of these things never occurred to me. But, I do understand these are important considerations for many racers.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
There are approximately 145 IHRA stock eliminator classes now, what the heck, there is always room for one or two more ...
__________________
Chuck Beach 3340 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
are pretty much evolved,where the new ones are just evolving.Someone will probably say that the F.I. cars were in the same catogory,but they duked it out mostly in their own class.Now that the hp got needed corrections they blend in to the established classes they are in.Lets see what developes. Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Chuck,
Mike is very much aware of IHRA's "too" many classes reputation. He feels everybody should have a fair place to race and offers no apologies. Nor should he. You can always call him if you would like to discuss it further.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Ed,
So all new combinations are supposed to have their own class to "duke it out" until they evolve? Basically, that is what you are saying and it is rubbish. This is RACING! Not everything can be fair and not everyone can be a winner. If the older combos were tapped out, no one would be getting HP, but that isn't the case because all combinations, when worked on, continue to evolve. Fact is, Detroit is finally building cars that are fast again and that are interesting to Stock racers. These cars are fast, in most cases way faster than any true muscle car of the '60s, thanks to development in the entire engine (not just EFI). I love the early muscle but for comparison's sake, my wife's 2007 Mustang GT automatic with only a performance re-flash to the computer went 13.28 at 105 mph (in killer air). With gears and a cold-air intake it's in the 12s. That is quicker and faster than virtually all of the coveted muscle cars, which we all love. The Mustang has only 281ci and weighs 3,600 lbs. Evan
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Live Reporter
|
![]()
Evan -- You're soooooooo right -back in the day I had a new '69 Z-28 that was a second slower than your wife's Mustang.......BTW , does she know you were trackin' with her car ?
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 400
Likes: 7
Liked 115 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Shhhhhhh, if she sees this thread I'm dead!
__________________
Evan Smith 1798 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|