|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I can't find the specifications for the 400 cu in 4 barrel equipped engine in the NHRA classification guide. I believe it may only have been available in a Chevelle. Any thoughts on where I can find them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 474
Likes: 106
Liked 89 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Check under the 1975 Chevrolet specs on nhra.com
__________________
Chuck Norton |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Make sure your talking SBC 400 or BBC 402
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Chuck and Jeff. Going by a old Motors manual that I have Chevrolet offered a 400 cu in small block in a 1970 Chevelle with a quadrajet with the highest hp rating that I have seen and I am assuming that is the engine being used by those runnuing a 400 sbc you see running in GT/C and GT/D. But yet I can't find that engine listed in NHRA's classification guide. I guess my next step would be to contact NHRA.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
The only 400 SBC that I ever saw in 1970 was a 265 hp 2 barrel.It had a 313 intake,a big 2 barrel Rochester,and 81/2:1 compression. It would have been a ball with a set of 041 or 186 heads, a 5577 intake, and a QJ.Unfortunately, it never came that way. The first four barrel 400's were in the later 70's. around 74 or so. It was intended as a replacement for the 402. One of our friends in high school graduated in '73, so his folks got him a brand new orange 73 Z-28 Camaro, four speed and all. From the time they got the car, it had a vibration at certain RPM's. He was changing the oil in it one day, and noticed that the block had three freeze plugs on each side. He asked his friend at the Chevy dealer about that, they looked at it,and the suffix on the block number indicated that it was a 400. It had the big 350 balancer, and a non- counterweighted flywheel.It seems the factory accidently(?) installed a 400 short block in place of the 350. The Z 350 even that late still had a four bolt block, a steel crank, forged pistons, a reasonably good hydraulic camshaft, push rod guide plates, 2.02 /1.600 valves, a high rise and a QJ. This 400 had the Z 28 heads, the finned valve covers, the high rise,the QJ, etc,but it was an accident. Makes me wonder who at the factory stole the correct short block.Sure was fast on the street!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 474
Likes: 106
Liked 89 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The motor being used in Super Stock GT is the one from 1974-75. My friend, Tony Mandella, runs that combination in John Hennessay's GT/DA car. You never saw one in a real Super Stocker because the cars that it came in were too ugly to race. You can't count on Motor's or Chilton's to match up with anything in NHRA's books. Unfortunately, the horsepower rating on that motor has been blown through the roof by GT racers over the past ten years. It's still OK but it's not the killer it was at one time. c
__________________
Chuck Norton |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green Creek (Tryon) North Carolina
Posts: 331
Likes: 69
Liked 99 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]()
I think the 400 is still rated at 280 or 285 in superstock. It would be neat to see one of them 2 ton sleds running class against the 283's and 289's. Don Jackson
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|