HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2012, 09:18 AM   #1
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Modified return?

Watching and reading the posts on the "Bogus HP ratings" . Everyone is well aware of the fact NHRA cannot, will not, or cares not to make the field level based on HP ratings.
I realize most are "born and bred" Stock or SS racers where ratings WERE the answer.
Why not move more and more to the Modified classes currently present? No advantage to anyone who builds one over another.
Why not support the lb/cubic inch class of your choice and help push the level field by leaving it to the "Bogus Hp cars" and still racing on a more equal basis?
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 11:55 AM   #2
SS/GSI
Member
 
SS/GSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 292
Likes: 79
Liked 759 Times in 109 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Weight to cubic inch is for Comp, bad enough we have to deal with the cars already within the SS ranks, jut my 2cents. NHRA doesn't mind experimenting with new classes (9.0,10.0,11.0, pro ET, snowmobiles,etc...) why don't they try a nostalgia SS and Modified/Modern SS class splitting real SSerz + traditional RWD conversion GT cars from the modified, front wheel conversion, new cars and/or EFI 1990-20xx cars?
__________________
Kevin Gaffney
1123 SS/GA
SS/GSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 10:52 PM   #3
Steve Williams
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Modified return?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS/GSI View Post
Weight to cubic inch is for Comp, bad enough we have to deal with the cars already within the SS ranks, jut my 2cents. NHRA doesn't mind experimenting with new classes (9.0,10.0,11.0, pro ET, snowmobiles,etc...) why don't they try a nostalgia SS and Modified/Modern SS class splitting real SSerz + traditional RWD conversion GT cars from the modified, front wheel conversion, new cars and/or EFI 1990-20xx cars?
What is wrong with weight to cubic inch Super Stockers? I think that the limited teardown inspection appeals to many racers in these classes. What do they check these days? Weight, fuel, trans brake wiring and carb size? The thing I have learned over the last 35 years is that complaining rarely ever gets something changed. It happens less than bigfoot sightings. The people that care about bogus HP ratings are not employed by the NHRA. It is you and they don't really care for you, the racer. They want your money, not your opinion (even if it is a popular opinion that makes sense). Listening stops once the money exchanges hands. Expect this to continue until you quit racing. There have been some dandy people that have worked for NHRA and there are still some of the good guys around. Enjoy the good guys that actually have some knowledge right now, because they seem to be in short supply nowadays and more leave every year it seems.
Steve Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 11:45 PM   #4
Michael Colaluca
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Weight per cubic inch with a spec cylinder head... Keep it simple and have the cost controlled. Talk about a dream!
Michael Colaluca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 08:40 AM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,714 Times in 1,738 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Colaluca View Post
a spec cylinder head...
You mean like in Stock? Never work. The only way something like this can be kept under control would be to restrict the size of the throttle body and restrict the outlet size of the collector.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K

Last edited by Billy Nees; 12-14-2012 at 08:40 AM. Reason: Sp
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 11:44 AM   #6
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Nees View Post
You mean like in Stock? Never work. The only way something like this can be kept under control would be to restrict the size of the throttle body and restrict the outlet size of the collector.
Funny, I was discussing that with some circle track racers at Indy... some series have restricted the exhaust, but didn't sound like anyone's limited both the intake *and* the exhaust together.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 04:40 PM   #7
buzzinhalfdozen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bellevue Ohio
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

I've never understood the dislike of the lbs. per cube cars. Though I'm sure there are some traditional super stock racers who look down their noses at them I believe the GT cars were in the same boat at one time. Hey I just enjoy the class... and enjoy having a place to race.
__________________
Joe Buchanan SS/BX 3117
buzzinhalfdozen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2012, 06:44 PM   #8
Michael Kilduff
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

I'm pretty sure Herb McCandless Jr., was running a heads up class at Piedmont 5-6 years ago that used exhaust restriction and intake restriction. When I talked to him on the phone about it he said the cars were running right around 7.40s and had decent participation .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Beard View Post
Funny, I was discussing that with some circle track racers at Indy... some series have restricted the exhaust, but didn't sound like anyone's limited both the intake *and* the exhaust together.
__________________
IHRA STK 932 O/SA
Michael Kilduff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 11:54 AM   #9
randy wilson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Get real! A spec head works great for the circle track boys, and the stands are packed with 1,500 to 2,000 spectators a night. Let Brodix be the head tech, and there you go. Hard to hide anything with the guys who design, and cast those heads. Pounds per cube would work under that scenario, It's high time they did something that put the spectator back in the stands. Anyone who's not smart enough to run competitive under those simple rules, really has no bussiness running a pounds per cube class. This other stuff they pretend to police, and the high costs in todays world, is killing any pretense of class racing. Just my thoughts. But with the way the economy is going now, I doubt anything will work. NHRA has people in charge that has no idea what actually makes dragracing interesting anymore.
__________________
don,t have one
randy wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 12:06 PM   #10
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Modified return?

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzinhalfdozen View Post
I've never understood the dislike of the lbs. per cube cars. Though I'm sure there are some traditional super stock racers who look down their noses at them I believe the GT cars were in the same boat at one time. Hey I just enjoy the class... and enjoy having a place to race.
If I had any sense (I don't) I would have built a hood scoop SS car going in. If I weren't so close to the end I would make it one now. Never enjoyed anything as much as my old C/SM Camaro in Modified eliminator. Cylinder heads were restricted enough a poor boy could afford one, yet other rules weren't so restrictive you couldn't experiment in other areas. Cylinder head restrictions are the big thing, imho.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

Last edited by Ed Wright; 12-19-2012 at 07:35 PM.
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.