HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-03-2014, 07:40 PM   #1
Dragsinger
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
Default aerodynamic body design, thoughts? advantages? Experience?

Racers,

I am interested in your experience and thoughts. maybe someone has taken less aero package and put the same power train in a more aero package.

The set up;

in this example, consider what we might refer to as a "shoe box" [many of the 60's body designs qualify as non-aero packages, flat front, more upright windshield, taller roof line, etc]

then consider a more aero style, smaller frontal area, more laid back windshield, lower roof profile, maybe a factory rear aero rear device.

Maybe someone has taken a 1965 Chevelle [shoe box] and put that same power train in a 1990 Firebird [aero package]

What about the "aero advantage?" For the power, speeds, performance of 9 second, 10 second super stockers/ stockers, does it matter? It is true we many have examples of many races won with less aero packages? OR, is the aero advantage truly an advantage and changing to the newer body styles a valid idea?
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W
Dragsinger is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.