|
|
09-01-2014, 12:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
60 ft time question.
What 60 ft time would be good for our car?
It runs 10.70-10.80 with a C4 transmission. |
|
|
|
09-01-2014, 04:17 PM
|
#2 |
|
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 2,783
Liked 2,462 Times in 694 Posts
|
Re: 60 ft time question.
Low 1.4's would be about right.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
|
|
|
|
09-02-2014, 03:09 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 60 ft time question.
1.45 best so far.
Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
09-02-2014, 03:25 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: 60 ft time question.
You should be able to do better than 1.45 with your car. When my '71 429 is going 10.70 to 10.80s my 60's have been in the 1.39 to 1.41 range depending on the track. 4.88 gear and 5600 rpm converter, 3700 lbs. The 429 probably doesn't have much if any more low end torque than a 351C as it has a short stroke and a much heavier rotating assembly.
Bill H
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
|
|
|
|
09-03-2014, 02:00 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 60 ft time question.
1.40 short time is our new goal then,thanks Bill and John.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
