|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 158
Likes: 2
Liked 31 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Anyone know what happened to Corey Hopkins? Saw him make runs on the live feed but didn't show up on the final qualifying sheet.
__________________
Michael Brand II 505B - F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Statement of Action Against Participant The NHRA disqualified Corey Hopkins from the July 25-26, 2019 Lucas Oil Drag Racing Series event at Heartland Motorsport Park. During the technical inspection process, it was discovered that the intake manifold did not comply with the rules. This is a violation of Section 11A, Intake Manifold, page 5 of the 2019 NHRA Rulebook.
__________________
S/ST 51 S/C 53 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LONG ISLAND N.Y.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 3,374
Liked 1,820 Times in 425 Posts
|
![]()
So when did they find it.? Or did a racer point it out.
__________________
james perrone 1290 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 35
Liked 478 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
The 383 666 intake is a hot issue.
Apparently it is approved for 62-67 and 70 and up, but not for 68-69. Everyone was under the assumption that it was approved for 68-69 and most claim that it was stated that way previously. Does anyone have an old accepted products document that possibly lists this?
__________________
Austin Williams 3 SG 464Q STK SC |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 100th Meridian
Posts: 569
Likes: 116
Liked 280 Times in 139 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 101
Liked 18 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
This too weird, that manifold was standard issue on 69 model years, and rule book plainly says must be year claimed or accepted for other years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 231
Likes: 35
Liked 478 Times in 91 Posts
|
![]()
He raced the second race at topeka (sat-sun race) once the intake was changed out.
__________________
Austin Williams 3 SG 464Q STK SC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Grand Forks ND
Posts: 243
Likes: 506
Liked 137 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]()
Here's the skinny on the Mopar 383 666 intake deal as I see it... So take it for what it's worth. As Jack stated above the 666 intake started showing up on 383s from Ma Mopar in mid to late year 69 and was the standard in 70-71. When a racer went thru the trouble to get this intake approved for his 66 combo and somehow got it approved for 62-67 383's (which to my knowledge it was never available on) somehow it ended up disappearing from the 69 list. Which is crap in my opinion that A:it got approved in the first place and B: that it got removed from a combo that it is correct for. I believe when Corey's engine was originally built the 666 was listed as a legal intake, when he was checked in Topeka and told the intake was not legal, he went and got a intake that is what is now shown as correct in the guide, Installed got reteched, and went about his business of having a beautiul fast car!
__________________
John A. McLaughlin 5757 B/S 440-6 or G/S 383 70 Road Runner, Dad's 5096 K/SA 70 Two Ton Tamater, Taylor's,Alec,Breezy |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 232
Likes: 168
Liked 116 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]()
That intake first showed up for the 1970 model year. Period. The choke thermostat needs a cup and gasket under it because it is open the the exhaust crossover. That intake never came on a 1969 model year vehicle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|