|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
My name is Dane McIntosh (#5733) and run in Stock Eliminator. I would like to make known some of my thoughts on fuel sampling.
In my opinion, the current requirements are very dangerous. I have had 40+ years hauling fuel to ag customers, oil field customers and retail outlets. I also have 20+ years of transporting fuel from the refineries. #1 All vehicles (ie: race cars) have to be grounded - remember it is on four rubber tires. When you touch the vehicle at ANY time - you are the ground and this is when a spark can occur. Your damp feet (even in rubber soled shoes) will make continuity. #2 Very Important - nothing electrical can be on - the fuel pump CANNOT be used to retrieve the sample. Exxon Mobil quidelines include: no cell phones, no radios and no lights (nothing electrical) on while loading fuel. All trucks have to have shielded alternators and starters and no catalytic converters. #3 Plastic containers, buckets and hoses are totally banned. Metal buckets w/ground straps only. #4 You never expose gas vapors to anything hot ie: the engine you just shut off at fuel check. #5 You never set any containers on a table that is not grounded - NHRA's table? #6 You never allow fuel to come in contact with your skin, rubber gloves should be used. When a spark and fire erupts you may have a chance to elude a catastrophic injury. I have been force fed by Exxon Mobil some horrific film of fires where toddlers and moms were killed by leaving vehicles running while fueling. These "real life" films leave an unforgetable memory and you do make every effort to not let it happen to you. I would only support gravity sampling directly from the fuel tank or cell with a 1/4 turn brass valve into a metal container that is on the ground as the metal container will ground itself and the vapors will stay low. N.H.R.A. needs to consult with the fuel experts - who will agree with what I've stated and change the sampling policies. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Good post some very good points here. Just out of curiosty I have to ask, why no catalytic converters? Is it because of the heat they can generate?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mother Earth
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
Dane, good information there. It can be exciting when taking a fuel sample from a fuel injected car after a run. I have a petcock at the tank to take a sample, but NHRA told me at Reading a few years ago it was no longer allowed.
__________________
Rapare-Racing.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
there is a reson that you can't sample from the cell, and must sample from the front of the car. I think there is some good info in that post, and its definetly all OSHA and DOT compliant. However I think that accommodating those requirements would make the fuel check process completely impractical. we are dealing with 2-4oz of fuel here, in cars that in alot of cases have a maximum capacity of 3-5 gallons. This is also after a run. Liquid Gasoline is not the issue, Gasoline vapors are. there just isnt that much vapor that can escape through an 1/8NPT fitting.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 5
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Real easy fix for all of this is to scrap Fuel Checks altogether. NHRA doesn't check for nitrous every run so why bother. Heck why not just provide an oil sample from the pan and have the chemists inspect it for everything not legal
__________________
N/A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Maybe no weight check either.Or helmets and pants.It's too hot in the car.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945 Former IHRA #1945 T/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Ed do you wear pants in your T/SA?
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 728
Likes: 5
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
Remember! NHRA hates dealing with all of this SS and Stock complication dragging/slowing them down. They just want to run a SHOW and make money without having us cost them money. They're looking at TD and TS and thinking wow no legality complaints with this hood or that hood, no fuel check and unlimited rules motors. That means less money out of the NHRA's pocket if they don't have to police these things. There is nothing worse than complaints about him/her being too fast too slow. Damn it it's a bracket race no matter how you slice it................................................ ..
.
__________________
N/A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Ed , You got the holeshot on me about the ERC.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 950
Likes: 560
Liked 198 Times in 79 Posts
|
![]()
I agree with most of what was said concerning pumping fuel and wearing rubber gloves. If you have a chance to get a MSDS on gasoline you will never want this stuff touching your skin again. When they first started fuel check I had a drain valve at the rear of the car,but that was no longer allowed after the first year of checking fuel. It will take a serios accident to happen before NHRA/IHRA understands the danger involved with checking fuel using the current method.
__________________
Mike Fuller 396 STK 3961 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|