HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2011, 10:12 AM   #1
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Why can stock be really stock?

Ok, I know I'm going to get blasted for this, but here goes. Why can stock eliminator be really all stock components. Stock should be stock and if and when your budget allows you to, you can move to super stock if this is what you want. As far as I'm concern building a stocker(I'm presently doing) is more like building a super stocker. Maybe NHRA should introduce Pure Stock back to allow some new blood back in our sport. Motor, transmission,suspension and everything else are putting a drag on the build. I love the ingenuity that stock racer bring with their many types of combo's(one of the reasons I enjoy Indy so much) from PT Cruisers to Cadillacs all have found a place to race in Stock eliminator and I hope that it never stops but we have to stop the bleeding and return to our roots. NHRA Bring Back Pure Stock! Claude Ruel
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 11:06 AM   #2
Todd Boyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Saint John NB Canada
Posts: 561
Likes: 29
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Why can stock be really stock?

IHRA has Pure Stock so why not NHRA. Maybe that's why "N" won't do it - "I" has it. I think it's a great idea. Likely at least somewhat cheaper than Stock Eliminator as it is today.
Todd Boyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 01:32 PM   #3
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Why can stock be really stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cicero819 View Post
Ok, I know I'm going to get blasted for this, but here goes. Why can stock eliminator be really all stock components. Stock should be stock and if and when your budget allows you to, you can move to super stock if this is what you want. As far as I'm concern building a stocker(I'm presently doing) is more like building a super stocker. Maybe NHRA should introduce Pure Stock back to allow some new blood back in our sport. Motor, transmission,suspension and everything else are putting a drag on the build. I love the ingenuity that stock racer bring with their many types of combo's(one of the reasons I enjoy Indy so much) from PT Cruisers to Cadillacs all have found a place to race in Stock eliminator and I hope that it never stops but we have to stop the bleeding and return to our roots. NHRA Bring Back Pure Stock! Claude Ruel
IHRA already has this but IHRA isnt all over the country for everyone. The so called pure stock class' IHRA has is very similar to the old Jr. stock. When stock was really stock as in 1972 in NHRA it was a joke. Guys still cheated like crazy and tear down was a major pain in the butt. Thats the reason the way stock is what it is today. The tech guys who really know/knew this stuff are long gone except for maybe good people like Travis,Dave Ley and Westly. Its labor intensive to have tear downs like we used to have back befor 1985 or so before the cam and valve spring rules changed. They might as well combine stock and S/S these days as todays stockers are more radical than my old SS/IA Camaro was in 1977/78.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 02:39 PM   #4
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: Why can stock be really stock?

This sounds like an interesting idea - after all, "everything old is new again!"

Case in point - Roy Hill is building a Mustang Cobra Jet Super Stock for "Match Racing"! The idea being (I guess!) is to get others to build DP's and Mustang's (and Camaro's?) to race each other around the country. Is this 1964 again???

Who builds the first "altered wheelbase" DP? My head's still spinning!

Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 04:29 PM   #5
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Unhappy Re: Why can stock be really stock?

I doubt it will fly. About 11 years ago we tried to set up best out of 3 or 5 match races with some of the better known IHRA top stockers (NHRA racers also and before the crate engine joke that GM rammed down our throats). Guys like Mike Keener, Jim Morgan, and some others in 9 second and 10 flat REAL A/S and B/s cars. Wheel standing gear jamming on a 5 tenths pro tree and all. it was the best show on the planet the first year kind pof like real Pro Stock in 1970 but it went no where.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 05:16 PM   #6
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Talking Re: Why can stock be really stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
I doubt it will fly. About 11 years ago we tried to set up best out of 3 or 5 match races with some of the better known IHRA top stockers (NHRA racers also and before the crate engine joke that GM rammed down our throats). Guys like Mike Keener, Jim Morgan, and some others in 9 second and 10 flat REAL A/S and B/s cars. Wheel standing gear jamming on a 5 tenths pro tree and all. it was the best show on the planet the first year kind pof like real Pro Stock in 1970 but it went no where.
Terry,didn't the threat of "lawyer intervention" help kill Top Stock?????????????
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 05:53 PM   #7
Tony Janes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 86
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Why can stock be really stock?

The way I see the problem, is simply change the name from stock to jr. super stock. Then we would not have to worry about what is stock and what is not stock.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS
Tony Janes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 11:10 PM   #8
rx dealer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Orion, Michigan
Posts: 337
Likes: 12
Liked 53 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Why can stock be really stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Terry,didn't the threat of "lawyer intervention" help kill Top Stock?????????????
Ed. G.M pulled the plug on sponsorship, so we (the racers) were forced to self sponsor the class and it was expensive and it caused many racers to stop racing or switch class. soon after things fell apart, to this day i miss Top/Stock at the end it was called Pro Top/Stock...Luke SS 311

Last edited by rx dealer; 06-25-2011 at 11:21 PM.
rx dealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 09:16 AM   #9
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Why can stock be really stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Terry,didn't the threat of "lawyer intervention" help kill Top Stock?????????????
Im not quite sure about the "Lawyer intervention" part of it killing it off but it was the forever expansion of rules and the massive cheating not to mention the "buying off" of a tech official who was supposed to be checking this crap several years after I threw in the towel. The existence of non stock intake manifolds on the now allowed FI cars and ported throttle bodies on LS 1 type engines and so on. The GM engineer (Gary Penn) screwed it all up initionally by shoving the crate motors down our throats. Myself and Mike Keener had our "hands tied". It was a good idea in the beginning but when outside forces who know NOTHING about stock racing try to run the show it turned into a nightmare. Even Keener gave up not long after I quit. When it became a "Self sponsored" race one team in particular bought their way into a Championship. The rules went crazy in the allowed parts and no one was around to police it. It was a circus. Or better yet you could call it a "Monkey F##K". It became like allowing the inmates running the crazy house. If the new cars are allowed in a top stock program as I heard MIGHT be revived (Not in IHRA) then it will be a joke all over again with the bogus HP factors being used. Lets hope they wont be allowed to run with the older cars unless the HP factor are brought up to speed or a new DP or Mustang will be all you see running heads up.
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 11:33 AM   #10
cicero819
VIP Member
 
cicero819's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aylmer Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 31
Liked 69 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Why can stock be really stock?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Janes View Post
The way I see the problem, is simply change the name from stock to jr. super stock. Then we would not have to worry about what is stock and what is not stock.
Mr Janes, we have super stock exactly for that direction, we still need stock. In a purest form only format. There is so many great combinations such as Ed Fernandez, Billy Nees who are proving that you can do so much with what you have.CR
cicero819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.