|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
Liked 276 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
All 92-98 Chevrolet LT1 350 engines are now at 291 horsepower for GT classes effective immediately. Check the Classguide on...
www.NHRARacer.com Travis Miller (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Liked 50 Times in 25 Posts
|
![]()
Did the LT1 come in the 92 Corvette? Because the 92 Camaro was tuned port.
Last edited by Frank B.; 09-20-2011 at 08:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Travis, that is just the Aluminium head LT1, right?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Elizabethtown IN
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
This all came from me claiming the 1995 LT1 that was rated 287 and had been that since July 2009 instead of the others that are 291 it was there so I claimed it... and someone called NHRA on it and they found it. Anyway I will have to be 20lbs heavier than I was at Indy because my old bodied cavalier coundnt make minimum. So here it is im not a bragger but who ever thought this was going to slow me down much and if you think you can out run my old out dated bodied cavalier with your new car or what ever car you choose to run bring it to Columbus this week end . Quit your whinning and man up.......
__________________
Dave Tincher 306 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
No thinking person would have claimed any other year model.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Dave, just buy my Firebird and go to Superstock at at 279HP. See ya at Columbus
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
Liked 276 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
1993-1996 350 LT1 shown in Corvette, Camaro, Firebird 1997-1998 350 LT1 shown in Camaro, Firebird The 1995 Camaro 350 LT1 for GT was rated at 287 while all others had been refactored up to 291. Now all are at 291 for GT effective immediately. Therefore loophole closed. Travis Miller (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.) PS. Yes Ed, I am addressing the aluminum head LT1 only. Last edited by Travis Miller; 09-20-2011 at 08:20 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Travis.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
Liked 61 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I think its great that they closed "a" loophole, how bout closing a few more......like making all lt-1's run at 291, or all 350/300's run at the same number, or all the 327/295's run at the same number, blah blah blah......the list goes on. why does a 69 with a cowl run lighter than a 69 with a flat hood, common sense says DUH!, or a 67 camaro w/a 327/295 run at 295 and a duece at 307, once again...DUH, all any of this needs is someone like Travis that has common sense and a good understanding of whats going on to straighten it out. Frankly its a joke, and I won't be back till it is fixed. Been gone two years and I will stay gone many more if need be, but hell they won't miss my mouth.
Joe B |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|