|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
For Pro Mod that is. Love the part about keeping costs down.
http://www.nhraracer.com/content/gen...757&zoneid=132 But not so much for Stock and Super Stock. I guess nhra staff understands the definition of Parity. But nhra doesn't appear to understand, that as a rule making organization, Parity must apply to competitors in all categories.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK Last edited by Bruce Noland; 01-07-2012 at 12:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
From the dark side. Somebody post a picture of Darth Vador (Vader) whatever.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
Parity is from the light side.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
I like the "Cost savings"
Now if you want to race go out and buy these turbos. Oh, and buy another block/pistons and/or crank and downsize your engine. I think the turbo guys took it in the pocketbook. For sure it will slow down their "Run Away" with the class.
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Decatur Illinois
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
How about this?
__________________
Steve Jackson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raleigh, N.C
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Why limit it to one turbo manufacturer only ??? I know Precision make a great product, but there are others just as good.
__________________
Chris Whitaker Chris3 Racing 71 Duster Wendell,NC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]()
For the same reason that the new OEM cars have been unleashed on Stock and Super Stock. MONEY
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
This turbo source limitation is just another facet of NHRA's iron-fisted approach to "keeping the cost of racing down," like their across-the-board BAN on pneumatic valve springs.
Formula I has been using pneumatic VALVE SPRINGS (NOT actuators) exculsively, for many years. The outrageous price of a set of Titanium valve springs for a 10,000+ rpm motor with 1-inch + valve lift (Pro Stock and Top Alcohol Funny Car come to mind) has to be a major part of those teams' budget, because thy only last a few runs... but NHRA is keeping the cost of racing down... Gee, I wonder how that ACROSS THE BOARD BAN ever got into the rule book??? Multi-valve, F-1 dohc engines that spin 20,000 rpm and have to last for many miles, have a formidable engineering task when it comes to valve springs; they choose AIR. I'd bet that a 2-valve drag racing engine that spins HALF those RPM's for a few seconds, would be a cake-walk for the design engineers at Del West engineering in Arizona... Just sayin'...
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|