New Mopar Intake approval

Adger Smith · 07-23-2017, 04:58 PM

Is this the new Mopar intake awaiting NHRA approval?
Dig the part number!!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminum-Tun...-/152603504474

Coleydog · 07-23-2017, 07:09 PM

Yea, they should, been hard to find the cast iron one for sometime. Came factory on RR and Newports

James L Miller · 07-23-2017, 08:30 PM

Adger, please submit one of these for the 440-6 for Stock. I have one, but it has popsicle sticks glued to the floor. With the aluminum top on the right. The wooden looking one probably won't be legal for stock. They had Chrysler part numbers on them and several tops.

James L Miller · 07-23-2017, 08:41 PM

More of the Weiand cross/tunnel ram intake. Paul Rossi ran this on his Sixpack Challenger 40 years ago. It must have terrible distribution with the 6 pack. I can see where fuel ran all over the bottom of the plenum (very shallow) from the center carb.

Paul Precht · 07-23-2017, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James L Miller

Adger, please submit one of these for the 440-6 for Stock. I have one, but it has popsicle sticks glued to the floor. With the aluminum top on the right. The wooden looking one probably won't be legal for stock. They had Chrysler part numbers on them and several tops.

That looks like a 383 mani, they were popular for the 383/343 SS cars.

James L Miller · 07-24-2017, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Precht

That looks like a 383 mani, they were popular for the 383/343 SS cars.

I don't think Weiand made one for the B engines. That would have been a good intake for the 1962 383/343HP engine. It's a pretty tall intake though.

Paul Precht · 07-24-2017, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James L Miller

I don't think Weiand made one for the B engines. That would have been a good intake for the 1962 383/343HP engine. It's a pretty tall intake though.

I just checked my old Chrysler manual, it was at Keith Black they modded the 440-6 Weiand mani for the 383/343s, if you get a chance, can you measure the width of it or see if it has been milled.

James L Miller · 07-24-2017, 04:25 PM

Paul, my intake measures about 8.7" across at the rail (straight across, not on the diagonal along the valley rail). I have a B engine Hogan intake and it measures about 7.4" straight across. The Hogan has raised but has wide but short ports, so whatever heads they fit were extensively modified. The Weiand intake looks unmodified except for the popsicle sticks.

Coleydog · 07-24-2017, 07:29 PM

I'm pretty sure Weiand didn't make a 2/4 top. single dom and 3/2s only for the high block. With the fixes to the intake Chrysler did, the manifold worked quite well. Certainly not to be confused with the 2/4 tunnel ram in first post. Lookout you could be stirring up the wild dogs on this site about alumium Mopar intakes.

James L Miller · 07-24-2017, 10:26 PM

I was just jumping on Adger's post about the tunnel ram feeding him some straight lines so he could land the punch line. Bah-dum-dum!

I'll be here all night and don't forget to tip your waitress.

07-23-2017, 04:58 PM	#1
Adger Smith VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Texarkana Ark/TX Posts: 2,446 Likes: 575 Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts	New Mopar Intake approval Is this the new Mopar intake awaiting NHRA approval? Dig the part number!! http://www.ebay.com/itm/Aluminum-Tun...-/152603504474 __________________ Adger Smith (Former SS)

07-23-2017, 07:09 PM	#2
Coleydog Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 569 Likes: 36 Liked 50 Times in 35 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval Yea, they should, been hard to find the cast iron one for sometime. Came factory on RR and Newports

07-23-2017, 08:30 PM	#3
James L Miller Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 494 Likes: 6 Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval Adger, please submit one of these for the 440-6 for Stock. I have one, but it has popsicle sticks glued to the floor. With the aluminum top on the right. The wooden looking one probably won't be legal for stock. They had Chrysler part numbers on them and several tops. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Mopar 2 Ya!

07-23-2017, 08:41 PM	#4
James L Miller Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 494 Likes: 6 Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval More of the Weiand cross/tunnel ram intake. Paul Rossi ran this on his Sixpack Challenger 40 years ago. It must have terrible distribution with the 6 pack. I can see where fuel ran all over the bottom of the plenum (very shallow) from the center carb. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Mopar 2 Ya! Last edited by James L Miller; 07-24-2017 at 01:28 PM. Reason: Try to load photos again.

07-24-2017, 04:25 PM	#8
James L Miller Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 494 Likes: 6 Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval Paul, my intake measures about 8.7" across at the rail (straight across, not on the diagonal along the valley rail). I have a B engine Hogan intake and it measures about 7.4" straight across. The Hogan has raised but has wide but short ports, so whatever heads they fit were extensively modified. The Weiand intake looks unmodified except for the popsicle sticks. __________________ Mopar 2 Ya!

07-24-2017, 07:29 PM	#9
Coleydog Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 569 Likes: 36 Liked 50 Times in 35 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval I'm pretty sure Weiand didn't make a 2/4 top. single dom and 3/2s only for the high block. With the fixes to the intake Chrysler did, the manifold worked quite well. Certainly not to be confused with the 2/4 tunnel ram in first post. Lookout you could be stirring up the wild dogs on this site about alumium Mopar intakes.

07-24-2017, 10:26 PM	#10
James L Miller Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 494 Likes: 6 Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts	Re: New Mopar Intake approval I was just jumping on Adger's post about the tunnel ram feeding him some straight lines so he could land the punch line. Bah-dum-dum! I'll be here all night and don't forget to tip your waitress. __________________ Mopar 2 Ya!