HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2025, 07:08 PM   #1
Herbie Null
Member
 
Herbie Null's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 215
Likes: 86
Liked 439 Times in 69 Posts
Thumbs down No Mine Shaft for 2025!

The SRAC tried to bring back mine shaft rule this year, NHRA rules committee denied the request!! So let me understand this, no mineshaft rule at 100ft and all runs count, but at +4200ft at Indy the runs do not count towards the AHFS? �������� unbelievable! Can anyone explain the logic here?
__________________
Herbie Null 201 SS

Last edited by Herbie Null; 02-17-2025 at 07:17 PM.
Herbie Null is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2025, 07:26 PM   #2
Bob Gullett
VIP Member
 
Bob Gullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 57
Liked 504 Times in 116 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

There was a rumor that the AHFS would be not be used for all class eliminations but I'm guessing not.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S
Bob Gullett is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2025, 08:15 PM   #3
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,635
Likes: 1,929
Liked 10,691 Times in 2,227 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

So Indy is the only place us southern boys can say “Hay y’all watch this!”
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2025, 08:57 PM   #4
Sgrossi7158
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 22
Likes: 138
Liked 57 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

I hate the AHFS. I personally think that Stk/SS is a performance class and should be treated as such. ie; qualified field, lane choice to the lower qualifier, routine tear downs, etc. However, I realize NHRA has chosen not to go in that direction. NHRA has chosen the AHFS as a means to police the class. With that being the case, I don’t see the logic in waiving the AHFS at certain events. The system simply will not work as designed under these circumstances.
Sgrossi7158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2025, 11:25 PM   #5
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,799
Liked 2,483 Times in 697 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

I did not see the No Mineshaft on the NHRA website.

Did I miss it somewhere?.
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2025, 08:54 AM   #6
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 2,166
Liked 2,351 Times in 553 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

The mineshaft rule actually works against you if you make a fast run. It takes away all of the runs for the weekend that could be used to lower the average. Not just the fast run.
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams
NHRA Stock/SS 2007
GUMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2025, 09:27 AM   #7
countrypuppy4865
Senior Member
 
countrypuppy4865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 980
Likes: 17
Liked 228 Times in 70 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
The mineshaft rule actually works against you if you make a fast run. It takes away all of the runs for the weekend that could be used to lower the average. Not just the fast run.


This is especially bad at the end of the year.
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr.
4865 E/SA '04 GTO
4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird
countrypuppy4865 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2025, 09:51 AM   #8
Lyn Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 282
Liked 967 Times in 194 Posts
Unhappy Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

I think every new rule idea submitted was shot down by the rules committee. Some that I heard that got submitted for Stock were allowing addition valve reliefs to solve the piston ding problem, and allowing pistons to be made with the smaller size ring lands so racers would not have to use spacers. Both got shot down. I'm sure there were more. The poll that was taken to see if racers wanted the indexes lowered had a very low percentage of eligible racers voting, and it was shot down.

Last edited by Lyn Smith; 02-18-2025 at 09:59 AM. Reason: more info.
Lyn Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2025, 10:07 AM   #9
Rick J
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 102
Likes: 31
Liked 73 Times in 37 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyn Smith View Post
I think every new rule idea submitted was shot down by the rules committee. Some that I heard that got submitted for Stock were allowing addition valve reliefs to solve the piston ding problem, and allowing pistons to be made with the smaller size ring lands so racers would not have to use spacers. Both got shot down. I'm sure there were more. The poll that was taken to see if racers wanted the indexes lowered had a very low percentage of eligible racers voting, and it was shot down.
What's the piston ding problem?
Rick J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2025, 10:39 AM   #10
JP1738
Senior Member
 
JP1738's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 566
Likes: 1,606
Liked 1,171 Times in 333 Posts
Default Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!

wtf is the point of AHFS if it isn't employed at races where guys actually have to run their ***** wide open?
__________________
Dawson Pauley
#2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180
#2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide
JP1738 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.