2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

[SSDiv6]

2008 Mid Year Stock, Super Stock Horsepower Adjustments Announced

http://www.nhra.com/content/sportsma...0338&zoneid=85

[Chris Hill]

Thanks Chad Loge for the extra hp on the six pac!!! We appreciate it.

Good job protecting the combination by going too far under while getting out ran on a heads up run by a tenth!

[Just Observing]

Originally Posted by Chris Hill

Thanks Chad Loge for the extra hp on the six pac!!! We appreciate it.

Good job protecting the combination by going too far under while getting out ran on a heads up run by a tenth!

Doesn't matter to you guys it is still only 405 hp in the cuda, correct?

[RPinoski1]

Can anyone explain how the AHFS works for modified stuff? How are they grouped etc?

[SSDiv6]

Originally Posted by RPinoski1

Can anyone explain how the AHFS works for modified stuff? How are they grouped etc?

[Jared Jordan]

Originally Posted by Just Observing

Doesn't matter to you guys it is still only 405 hp in the cuda, correct?

NHRA's article states that 70-71 autos with the 440-6 are rated at 417, but the classification guide still shows the '70 Cuda @ 405 hp.

[Bryan Worner]

Originally Posted by Chris Hill

Thanks Chad Loge for the extra hp on the six pac!!! We appreciate it.

Good job protecting the combination by going too far under while getting out ran on a heads up run by a tenth!

Same thank you goes out to Jerry Silveus for getting the LT1 hit in GT......AGAIN......for absolutely no reason!

[Jeff Lee]

Repeat the mantra...
Ummmmmm...Performance Based Class....Ummmmmm...Performance Based Class.......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class.......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class.......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class.......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class.......Ummmmmm....Performance Based Class.........Ummmmmm.....Performance Based Class....Ummmmmmmm

[Chris Hill]

The B-body 70-71 is the six pac that was hit, the E-body guys have been smarter about going fast. The B-body has been more than the E-body for a couple of years now thanks to the west coast guys not thinking. Funny thing is they always loose two tenths going over the rockies.

The part that stinks is the six pac, 396, and LS-1 all get hit, but NO ONE can run with Hawk. He get's a thumbs up in my book on protecting his combination.

[J. Silveus]

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner

Same thank you goes out to Jerry Silveus for getting the LT1 hit in GT......AGAIN......for absolutely no reason!

I feel compelled to reply to Mr. Worner's comments, only because of how it was said.

Last year he or his brother cornered my daughter one time at the races when I mistakenly went more than 1.15 under and proceeded to tell her what they thought.

Now 1 year later I have two phone calls telling me it is on the internet that I have upset Mr. Worner. Several times at the race track he could have told me face to face what he thought but didn't. I have the most respect for his dad and probably raced him many times before he was born. It is just too bad he did not inherit his dad's integrity.

For most people who know me, I have run GT/BA just so the system would not give the LT1 horsepower and got beat two times because of that.

We are running on a seven year old system when there has been a 40-50 horsepower gain on almost any engine out there. The system is a deterrent on making cars run faster in a performance class.

I will say two more things: 1. I am 64 years old and this is the only hobby I have had for the last 40 years. I have always done it with my family. I can probably only do this for a few more years, no matter how goofed up the system is. 2. Now that Mr. Worner has shot off his mouth indirectly again, I will let my car do the talking from here on out.