HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2009, 02:17 PM   #1
Shawn S.Kvaas
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pitt Meadows, B.C.
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default 8.997 in GT/AA ?

I was just watching the live timing at lvms and it said frank ran 8.997@144.8 in the first session.On the sceond run it showed 9.18@139.If it is true,I hope he was going for the record.
Shawn S.Kvaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:15 PM   #2
Jared Jordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 613
Likes: 199
Liked 535 Times in 119 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jared Jordan
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn S.Kvaas View Post
I was just watching the live timing at lvms and it said frank ran 8.997@144.8 in the first session.On the sceond run it showed 9.18@139.If it is true,I hope he was going for the record.
If that's what the actual ET and MPH were then it corrects to an 8.844 @ 147.19. Way fast.

Correct me if I'm wrong but considering that 8.997 is -1.403 under the sea level index doesn't that mean that combo gets a hit on Monday?
__________________
Jared Jordan
9 B/SA
2024 Jeg's D7 All Star - Stock
Jared Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:52 PM   #3
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

I believe that alt.factored tracks are still sacred cows.Anything goes.No penalty.I'd like to see what those
supercharged Mustangs would do up there.8.50 chassis certification anybody?LOL

Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 07:55 PM   #4
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Question Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
I believe that alt.factored tracks are still sacred cows.Anything goes.No penalty.I'd like to see what those
supercharged Mustangs would do up there.8.50 chassis certification anybody?LOL

Ed F.
That's why I posted this on page one.But I guess because I never went 1.40 under before my comments dont count.Nice run either way.
Let's see what happens the next time someone who is not as well known and or respected as the Grossi's bombs a combination.Wonder if the accolades will flow as freely?

Ed F.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 11:57 PM   #5
Bryan Worner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 823
Likes: 133
Liked 525 Times in 84 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Dave,

Maybe they thought Norwalk was a factored track!! Damn, I thought I was up on all this crap! I guess I'll have to ask when I tech in at Phoenix!!

We should all go to Boise in April and let'em rip!!
Bryan Worner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 05:10 PM   #6
Lynn A McCarty
Member
 
Lynn A McCarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Congrats to Frank, Gary and Phil. Straight up it was one hellava run!
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS
Lynn A McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 05:11 PM   #7
Colin Wigle
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Jordan View Post
If that's what the actual ET and MPH were then it corrects to an 8.844 @ 147.19. Way fast.

Correct me if I'm wrong but considering that 8.997 is -1.403 under the sea level index doesn't that mean that combo gets a hit on Monday?
the time corrects to 8.78 at 148.49 think that will be the record until it is retired in two years. Great run!!
Colin Wigle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 05:35 PM   #8
ss3845
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwigle View Post
the time corrects to 8.78 at 148.49 think that will be the record until it is retired in two years. Great run!!
Another testament to those "spot on" altitude correction factors.

Jim McBean
ss3845 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:16 PM   #9
Jared Jordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 613
Likes: 199
Liked 535 Times in 119 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jared Jordan
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss3845 View Post
Another testament to those "spot on" altitude correction factors.

Jim McBean
You're right Colin. I used the wrong factor. I thought .9830 sounded strange.

Still really fast. Congrats to Frank, Phil, & co.
__________________
Jared Jordan
9 B/SA
2024 Jeg's D7 All Star - Stock
Jared Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:25 PM   #10
MikeFicacci
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
Liked 19 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 8.997 in GT/AA ?

1320go.com has the altitude at 1,000 and barometer at 30.42 on the first session. These cars are getting "factored" close to .25 in most cases. Thats fair.
MikeFicacci is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.