|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I've heard of 2 new rules for 2010! The "Locking Transmission Dipstick" rule and The "Parachute Mount Rule". The first one is pretty simple(I guess), except that it doesn't specify that the bottom of the dipstick tube(where most all leakage would come from)needs to be any type of specific seal ! I saw the list of approved ones and got the Lokar ones for my cars.
Does anyone know what the "Parachute Mount Rule Change" is? Rich S/C 13 Time To Move Racing "Creating Customers For Life" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brownsburg,Indiana
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
1/2 in bolt on the mount, got me in Bradenton.
__________________
Chuck Westcott- S/C -S/G 225 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
"Parachutes must have their own independent mounting with sleeved 3/8 1/2-inch
minimum steel bolts or steel pins required for all applications. Shroud line(s) mounting brackets must be constructed of minimum .090-inch steel. Material around the holes for the bolts/pins must be equal to or greater than the bolt/pin size." On the 2010 rule amendments page#22 the 1/2 has a line through it as if the are now allowing a 3/8 bolt! I'm more confused now since Chuck says they got him at Bradenton for what ? Having to big of a bolt? There is also a line through the complete last sentence in the above quote, but nothing to replace the wording? Rich Time To Move Racing "Creating Customers For Life" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Just returned from S&W Racecars and was told by Scott Weney that that rule change was recinded after he fabricated a retrofit part to be able to use a 1/2" bolt on their existing cars which all have been made (forever) using a 3/8" bolt to hold the chute lead! The division told him to hold off on this and that the rule was not going to be changed! Maybe D2 should find out the correct application of the rule before making Chuck and who knows else change their cars for nothing!
Rich S/C 13 Time To Move Racing "Creating Customers For Life" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brownsburg,Indiana
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
In Tech they were paying particular attention to Tranny locking Dip sticks and I was scolded for a better word for my 3/8 S/S Allen Head Chute Lead Bolt, said I need to have a 1/2 Bolt for the next race which is G-Ville this week.
What is the rule ? I'm not opposed to arguing , I would like to correct before this issue comes up in tech. They don't like being wrong !
__________________
Chuck Westcott- S/C -S/G 225 Last edited by Chuck Westcott; 02-15-2010 at 04:22 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Everett, Ma
Posts: 32
Likes: 27
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
The rule before was 1/2" bolt...I think it had to be Grade 8. This year's rule required the tabs to have1/2" material around the bolt hole. That rule was later revised to a 3/8" bolt for most classes (TF, NFC, TAD, and TAFC have their own specific revision). The problem with the stainless bolt may be it's not Grade 8 (though I bet any ARP stainless bolt is as strong as a "cheap" Grade 8.
How about these new rules... http://www.nhra.com/story/2010/2/15/...-participants/ A $1000 fine for using the wrong brake cleaner????
__________________
Paul Neal 119E TD/SC Dan Page 265" w/ Martin 632 6.490 @ 205.76 ...all motor! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|