Please explain

G Schenck · 06-11-2010, 10:29 AM

Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed
372 Jeg Coughlin 1681 Tom Baird
E1 0.068 10.008 124.03 ****WINNER**** 0.049 10.277 119.45
A/SA Dial: 9.97 (+/-): 0.038 A/S Dial: 10.20 (+/-): 0.077
Qualified: #2 10.019 -0.981 #46 10.299 -0.651

Doesn't look right to me.

Greg

ron mattson · 06-11-2010, 12:58 PM

it doesnt add up, jeg should have won. by .020

Dave Crouchet · 06-11-2010, 02:05 PM

Greg, the way it looks is maybe the front end of the winning car tripped the lights. some said they were on the brakes hard so that may be the answer. and we have heard and seen runs like these recently. but we`ll never really know because the cameras would not be on for stock!!!!!

Alan Roehrich · 06-11-2010, 02:15 PM

Jack Matayas gave the explanation in the other thread. Seems that Tom's dial was a 10.26, not a 10.20.

Dave Crouchet · 06-11-2010, 02:35 PM

thanks for the correction Alan.

Alan Roehrich · 06-11-2010, 02:51 PM

No correction from me, I ain't that smart. Thank Jack. I was still trying to figure out what happened myself, when Jack posted.

wildchild22 · 06-12-2010, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Crouchet

Greg, the way it looks is maybe the front end of the winning car tripped the lights. some said they were on the brakes hard so that may be the answer. and we have heard and seen runs like these recently. but we`ll never really know because the cameras would not be on for stock!!!!!

if that was the case it would still show in the numbers

06-11-2010, 10:29 AM	#1
G Schenck Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Harahan, La. Posts: 521 Likes: 41 Liked 81 Times in 35 Posts	Please explain Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed-----Car#-Driver(Opp'nt)-RT-----ET-- Speed 372 Jeg Coughlin 1681 Tom Baird E1 0.068 10.008 124.03 **WINNER** 0.049 10.277 119.45 A/SA Dial: 9.97 (+/-): 0.038 A/S Dial: 10.20 (+/-): 0.077 Qualified: #2 10.019 -0.981 #46 10.299 -0.651 Doesn't look right to me. Greg

06-11-2010, 02:05 PM	#3
Dave Crouchet Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: where the coonass!s are Posts: 98 Likes: 2 Liked 1 Time in 1 Post	Re: Please explain Greg, the way it looks is maybe the front end of the winning car tripped the lights. some said they were on the brakes hard so that may be the answer. and we have heard and seen runs like these recently. but we`ll never really know because the cameras would not be on for stock!!!!! __________________ *David Crouchet*

06-11-2010, 02:35 PM	#5
Dave Crouchet Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: where the coonass!s are Posts: 98 Likes: 2 Liked 1 Time in 1 Post	Re: Please explain thanks for the correction Alan. __________________ *David Crouchet*

06-11-2010, 02:51 PM	#6
Alan Roehrich Veteran Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Murfreesboro TN Posts: 5,105 Likes: 1,561 Liked 1,787 Times in 408 Posts	Re: Please explain No correction from me, I ain't that smart. Thank Jack. I was still trying to figure out what happened myself, when Jack posted. __________________ Alan Roehrich 212A G/S

06-11-2010, 12:58 PM	#2
ron mattson Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: cloquet mn Posts: 465 Likes: 17 Liked 66 Times in 29 Posts	Re: Please explain it doesnt add up, jeg should have won. by .020 __________________ Ron Mattson 5015 STK Last edited by ron mattson; 06-11-2010 at 01:01 PM.

06-11-2010, 02:15 PM	#4
Alan Roehrich Veteran Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Murfreesboro TN Posts: 5,105 Likes: 1,561 Liked 1,787 Times in 408 Posts	Re: Please explain Jack Matayas gave the explanation in the other thread. Seems that Tom's dial was a 10.26, not a 10.20. __________________ Alan Roehrich 212A G/S