HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2010, 12:51 PM   #1
Daran Summerton
Senior Member
 
Daran Summerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas nv
Posts: 600
Likes: 18
Liked 66 Times in 37 Posts
Default 1955-1960

What would be a decent combo and what rating do you think?

I have heard 58 348 was a fast car back then??? This is chevy but I'm guessing their are other brands as well.
__________________
72 cutlass
Daran Summerton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 01:31 PM   #2
Jeff Lee
VIP Member
 
Jeff Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1955-1960

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daran Summerton View Post
What would be a decent combo and what rating do you think?

I have heard 58 348 was a fast car back then??? This is chevy but I'm guessing their are other brands as well.
World Products just came out with a new W block
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX
Jeff Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 02:33 PM   #3
treessavoy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1955-1960

Mary Ann Foss killed everybody with her '58 Pontiac, 370ci, tri-power in D/SA. Mid 14's in '58.

JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree
treessavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 06:13 PM   #4
Dave Toce
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1955-1960

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lee View Post
World Products just came out with a new W block
It's not cast iron it is aluminum:
Read Here: http://www.worldcastings.com/product...nch-block.html

Probably not an acceptable substitution for a factory W block.
Dave Toce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 06:40 PM   #5
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,682 Times in 1,730 Posts
Default Re: 1955-1960

Daran, I've been trying to get someone to do a 1961 Bubbletop, 348/250 for years. Check out the specs on that one! At 250 HP it looks pretty good when it is stacked up against the 350s.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 10:36 PM   #6
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
Cool Re: 1955-1960

The heads on the 59 348 are the worst in the W motor family with tiny ports. That head is exclusive to the 348 block of that year due to water cooling passages-in other words, the 348 block in 58 can only be used with the 58 head. Later heads will result in a massive coolant leak by the spark plugs. A later 348 block topped with 58 heads would do the same thing. The World block is not only aluminum, but the bore size is way bigger than any maximum legal 348 overbore. The idea of the 61 Impala or Bel Air bubbletop with a 348/250 might work, and I think the hi-po 348 aluminum intake would be a legal replacement, since it was OEM. The '61 409/360 intake wouldn't be a bad choice, and some of the 4 jet carb guys are pretty good.Thirty years ago, a friend of mine in New Jersey had a 61 Impala 348/250 horse 4 speed combo that ran O/stock, went 13.00 at 103 back then. Broke a lot of rear ends.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 06:09 PM   #7
Alan Nyhus
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
Default Re: 1955-1960

From a motor/transmission aspect, the '61 348-250 with an automatic would be a good setup. These came with both PG's and TurboGlide transmissions...so running a TH350 would be the way to go. The high perf 348-305/340 h.p. alum intake probably wouldn't fly, as they used a Carter AFB (much bigger area under the carb) versus the 4GC on the 348-250. The 305's were hydraulic cams and the 340's were solid lifter cams.

A Biscayne or Bel Air sedan, a one piece driveshaft, and a 12 bolt in place of the original housing assy. would make for a pretty slick stocker. These motors are still available and pretty inexspensive.
Alan Nyhus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 03:16 PM   #8
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 406
Liked 2,050 Times in 398 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Default Re: 1955-1960

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daran Summerton View Post
What would be a decent combo and what rating do you think?

I have heard 58 348 was a fast car back then??? This is chevy but I'm guessing their are other brands as well.
Daran -- forget the 348 -- 57 283/245 or 283 /250 hp is the way to go and they fit all bodystyles
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.