|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,450
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Would you rather run a 30lb radial or a 20lb bias ply? My problem is no one makes a drag radial less than 30" and I can't fit a 30" tire under my 5.0. I am either forced to use a heavier 275/60/15 street radial tire with a questionable tread width of 8.5-9.5" or use a lightweight bias ply 28x9 slick. Are radials worth as much ET as everyone says?
Does NHRA have a ruling on 275/60/15 in stock eliminator? I would really like to use the new Goodyear 4305 but different websites advertise different tread width for it. Neither the Hoosier or Goodyear trucks had any DOT radials at zmax so we couldn't measure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If you can fit a 295-65-15 you will get 29.6 od, for 27 pounds..The MT et drag radials are the 38 pounders, but they are a very stout tire, were/are the choice for the super fast outlaw type cars, but they are 30 inch tires. I think the critical question for you is are you going to running a stick? If so the radial might work or not, with a low HP pure stock style Stang. On a non tire question......how do you block just the middle bulb? Eric I
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,450
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Eric, the hoosier dot radial was my other choice but it is a 10" tread width according to their website and jegs/summit sites so I don't know if its legal in stock eliminator. I am using an 8" rim so I don't know if that would bring it down to legal tread width.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
Gut says lower rolling resistance of radial will be faster than lower rotational inertia of bias ply tire.
Rotational inertia is more a factor the faster it spins and axle/tire wheel combo is very low speed relatively speaking. Axle rpm though traps will be in 1,500 rpm range for a stocker. Figure the stick guys would chime in here. Similar to a heavy vs. light flywheel debate and I don't have a dog in that fight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dresden On. Canada
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Rotating weight is not the same as flywheel weight . A heavy flywheel may help launch. Heavier rotating weight ( wheels tires brakes axles ) is just extra weight to accelerate. Depending on who's formula you believe tire weight is about 3 times as important as dead weight. ---Trevor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 64
Liked 345 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
You need to find out if a 275/60 D/R is legal for Stock or not.
If so, the Hoosier is a very good choice. For the past couple years it has been the tire of choice for X275 racers running as quick as 4.70's in the 1/8 mile with 60's in the mid teen range, so it's a proven performer. The Hoosier weighs 24 lbs each. Mickey Thompson came out with a tire to compete with the Hoosier which it's new part number is 3754X. Not fully released right now and again, need to verify legality for the stock class. The new M/T weighs 32 lbs each. Rumor has it Hoosier wasn't happy with M/T coming out with it's new "Pro" 275 and is planning a tire to compete with it. Should be interesting to see if and how this plays out. If legal, put them on a 10" rim. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Without moving my head around I can see both lanes stage, then nothing else until my third amber. If I could see my first amber, I would be red every time. I had aluminum blinders before, which required getting my head in position after staging. Since I pretty much always leave first, if the starter is fast my side of the tree sometimes started down by the time I got my head positioned. I'm old, so am kinda slow. With these I see everything I want to see without moving around. When I A-B-A tested same size (9" at the time) radials versus bias tires on my car, the radials were a solid 2/10ths and nearly three MPH. I had just started trying to race again. Not sure it was a bright thing to do. Anyway, Pete Peery told me they would be worth over a tenth. I kinda doubted it, he hasn't steered me wrong yet. They were the same size, same brand (Hoosier at the time) on identical wheels. All passes within an hour. Had to adjust my lights. Started going red with the radials. You mentioned tire weight. I have a pair of MT radials on the car. Also, on identical wheels, a pair of same size within 1/4" roll out Goodyears. They are 5 lbs per tire heavier than the MTs. They hook just as hard, my lights are the same, but they are 4 hundredths slower at the 1/4 mile, 2 hundredths in 60'. Must be the effect of inertia due to the weight, right? Five lbs on a 31" radius has a bigger effect tha five lbs off a 15" wheel, or a crank shaft. Wouldn't that be right?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 04-15-2014 at 08:59 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Ed:
So the Goodyear rears have a total of 10 lbs more rotational weight and slowed the car .04 sec. ? Good info there. Since I have a 4 cyl. car I am looking at going to a shorter tire and a taller gear in the lighter classes I run. I'll keep the 4.56 rear and 30" slicks for the heavier classes. I am hoping to reduce my rotational weight. Every little .01 counts.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Yes sir. I would think it would slow a faster car less, probably effect a slower car more?
I haven't owned a set of Hoosiers this size (13"x31") so don't know what they weigh. I have found taller makes more difference than wider as far as hooking also. May not be the same for other cars or tires. Has been the case with everything I have had. Edit: I would think the tire weight ET effect would also lessen with smaller diameter tires? Like 28" instead of my 31"? You can tell I'm just an old Okie, not an engineer.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 04-15-2014 at 11:04 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]()
Well, I have ran enough passes on some M&H DOT Drag radials in the last 8 months to come to a conclusion.
The DRs runs the same as my Hoosier 30 inch tall slicks on my car, even tho the drag radials are considerably heavier.( my car runs mid 12's) Right now, I am running 28 inch tall M&H dot drag radials that I bought in 2007 mounted on 17 x 8 wheels. They hook just as good and run the same e.t. numbers as my Hoosier 30 inch slicks on 15 x 8 wheels. So now I need to find out if NHRA will allow 275-60-15 DOT Drag Radials from M/T in Stock. My old M&H tires will soon wear out and my slicks are used up.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT Last edited by ALMACK; 05-13-2015 at 03:59 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|