|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Shepherdsville, Ky
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Looking opinions on which casting is the best for a SBC 350.... Any insight would be greatly appreciated
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NORTHEAST
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 569
Likes: 311
Liked 284 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]()
Carl… We've found the "386" and "388" blocks to be good also. They are usually Early 1968-69 castings, prior to the "010". The early 1969-70 "010" are very solid also, and in most cases have a "K12" behind the passenger cylinder head at rear of block. Always consider core shift that is noticeable at cam tunnel, try and find a block that has the cam tunnel bored centred with the thrust flange. Good Luck…MB.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NORTHEAST
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I should also add if you can find an 010/020 with 2482 on the center caps, Don't go by core shift as a sonic test is the only real way to tell if you have proper cylinder wall thickness. I have about 40 blocks that show no core shift but have failed a sonic test and have seen many blocks that show a ton of core shift but the cylinders were fine. Most blocks I have failed is because of one thin cylinder. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
What about the Bow tie blocks? Anyone found another manufacturer which is accepted ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Island of high taxes, N.Y.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Does the Dart SHP meet the criteria ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|