|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 19
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
The 1976 318-2V Plymouth is rated at 140/150. Looked at the blueprint guide and all the specs are the same. The bottom line is that they have been refactored the same. Why is there a difference ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 63
Liked 756 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
?? I see 185/195 like most other 318 2-bbl engines.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 2,733
Liked 2,398 Times in 679 Posts
|
![]()
76 to 80 318 140 = 2 Barrel Not real fast
78 to 80 318 150 = Thermoquad 4 barrel Real Fast! We have raced them both.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 2,843
Liked 5,002 Times in 1,902 Posts
|
![]()
I think the question is ..Why does the factory have two ratings for the same engine?
Answer : Don't worry about it. You're gonna have enough trouble making it run @190
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 63
Liked 756 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
California versions were rated at 140, rest of the US rated at 150. Functionally for stock eliminator they are the same since all the major blueprint specs are the same and the Technical Bulletins bear this out. The difference was in the tuning via ignition, primarily governed by the introduction of the Lean Burn system that was introduced that year. Of course, CA had stricter emissions standards which translated into a less efficient engine package and thus the lower hp.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|